Artificial language
Languages emerging from conventionalisation, not conscious design.
Chris 73 · CC BY-SA 3.0
Artificial languages are languages of a typically very limited size that emerge in computer simulations between artificial agents, robot interactions, or controlled psychological experiments with humans. Unlike consciously devised constructed languages, they are not deliberately invented but result from distributed conventionalisation processes, similar to natural languages. They are studied within the field of artificial language evolution, a sub-part of cultural evolution studies.
- Field
- Evolutionary linguistics, experimental semiotics
- Known for
- Emerging through conventionalisation processes in simulations and experiments
- Characteristics
- Limited size, short-lived, not documented or reused outside single trials
Lore & Background
The idea of creating constructed languages arose in the 17th and 18th centuries as Latin's international role declined. Early schemes aimed at developing a rational language free from living languages' inconsistencies, based on classification of concepts; later schemes incorporated material from living languages. The lack of empirical evidence in evolutionary linguistics led researchers to adopt computer simulations, hypothesizing that natural language is a complex adaptive system emerging through interactions. By building assumptions into simulations, they investigate language change and origins under controlled conditions. The paradigm later extended to psychological experiments with humans, leading to experimental semiotics.
Reader's Guide
Artificial languages are significant because they provide empirical, controlled means to study language evolution and conventionalisation dynamics. Unlike constructed languages, they are not designed by individuals but emerge from distributed interactions, mirroring natural language processes. Their limited size and short-lived nature are their main distinctions from natural languages, as all languages are artificial insofar as they are conventional. Researchers use them in developmental psycholinguistics, particularly in statistical language acquisition studies, where control over linguistic patterns is valuable. The field challenges the idea of a central designer and aligns with cultural evolution studies. Because the focus is on higher-level properties rather than specific conventions, these languages are typically not documented or reused outside the experiment or simulation in which they emerge. Their success has spawned experimental semiotics, extending the paradigm to human subjects.
Did You Know?
- Artificial languages emerge in computer simulations, robot interactions, or controlled psychological experiments.
- They are not consciously devised but result from distributed conventionalisation processes.
- Artificial languages are typically not documented or reused outside the single experiment or simulation run in which they emerge.
The Line Between Invention and Evolution
All writing systems are, in the broadest sense, human inventions. Yet the vast majority of scripts we encounter—ranging from Chinese characters to the Arabic script—did not spring fully formed from a single mind. Instead, they grew gradually, one borrowing from another, accumulating quirks over centuries. A language might first be rendered in a neighboring culture's alphabet and only slowly develop its own distinctive letters; the English letters w and j, for instance, were not formally recognized as full members of the English alphabet until the mid-1800s. Because most script inventors were themselves literate or at least familiar with existing writing, new systems tend to echo older ones, blurring the boundary between adoption and genuine creation. The Cyrillic and Gothic alphabets, heavily shaped by Greek models yet attributed to individual designers, illustrate this ambiguity. Only in a handful of cases—Cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs, the Chinese script, and the Mayan script—did writing emerge not from a predecessor script but from proto-writing, and even then the process was one of slow symbolic evolution rather than deliberate design.
Faith, Vision, and the Written Word
A remarkable number of constructed scripts were born from spiritual or religious impulses. Missionaries and scholars often devised new writing systems so that sacred texts could be rendered in languages that previously had none, a motivation behind scripts for the Cherokee, N'Ko, and Tangut languages. Religious leaders, too, have promulgated new alphabets among their communities to strengthen liturgical practice and cultural unity; examples include Sorang Sompeng, Medefaidrin, and the script created by the Zomi religious leader Pau Cin Hau. Beyond practical religious use, some scripts were crafted for what their inventors described as mystical or magical communication with spiritual entities. John Dee and Edward Kelley's Enochian alphabet, the Celestial and Theban scripts documented by Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa and his teacher Johannes Trithemius, and the litterae ignotae attributed to Hildegard of Bingen all fall into this category. Several of these systems were described by their creators as having been revealed through visionary experiences, lending them an aura of divine origin that distinguishes them from purely rational design.
Scripts for Stories and Screens
Constructed scripts have become a beloved feature of fiction, giving fictional worlds a tangible visual identity. The most celebrated examples belong to J. R. R. Tolkien, whose elaborate Tengwar and Cirth scripts were designed to accompany his invented Elvish languages. In the broader entertainment landscape, the pIqaD script was created for the Klingon language in Star Trek, while the D'ni writing system appeared in the Myst video game series. Some fictional works go a step further, using constructed scripts not as full language systems but as substitution ciphers or alternate orthographies for existing languages. English-language examples include the Orokin script from Warframe (affectionately called "Tennobet" by fans), the unnamed New World script in Kirby and the Forgotten Land, Aurebesh from the Star Wars franchise, and the alien glyphs that appear in the animated series Futurama. These scripts, though tied to fictional settings, demonstrate how the craft of neography can enrich storytelling by giving audiences a visual artifact to decode and admire.
Engineering, Education, and Reform
Constructed scripts also serve highly practical technical and pedagogical goals. The International Phonetic Alphabet, a cornerstone of modern linguistics, extends the Latin alphabet with invented letters, Greek characters, and a rich set of diacritics to capture the full range of human speech sounds with precision. In the realm of teaching, John Malone's Unifon, Sir James Pitman's Initial Teaching Alphabet, and Alexander Melville Bell's Visible Speech were each invented to make literacy instruction more effective. Yerkish, a lexigram-based communication system designed for non-human primates, represents yet another technical application. On the reform front, the Deseret alphabet was promoted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the mid-1800s as a phonetically superior alternative for English, and roughly a century later the estate of George Bernard Shaw commissioned the Shavian alphabet for a similar purpose. Bradbury Thompson's Alphabet 26 pursued the same aim. Pushing reform into philosophical territory, proposed auxiliary languages such as aUI, Solresol, and the system outlined in John Wilkins's 1668 essay carry their own writing systems, while Charles K. Bliss's Blissymbols envision an international language whose primary mode is written rather than spoken.
Gallery






Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is an artificial language in the study of writing systems?
An artificial language is a small, emergent communication system that arises spontaneously within computer simulations, robot-to-robot interactions, or tightly controlled human experiments. It is not something a person sits down and designs; rather, it self-organizes among the agents involved.
How does an artificial language differ from a constructed language like Esperanto or Klingon?
Constructed languages are deliberately invented by a single author or committee with full grammatical and lexical planning. Artificial languages, by contrast, have no designer at all—they crystallize through distributed conventionalisation processes, much closer to how natural languages historically took shape.
Which academic fields study artificial languages?
They fall under the umbrella of artificial language evolution, a sub-discipline of cultural evolution research. The work draws heavily on evolutionary linguistics and experimental semiotics, often using agent-based simulations or laboratory interaction studies.
What are the defining characteristics of artificial languages?
They are typically very small in vocabulary and grammar, short-lived, and never documented or recycled beyond the single experimental trial in which they appeared. Once the simulation or experiment ends, the system effectively disappears.
Why do researchers consider artificial languages important to the broader study of language?
They offer a controlled window into how communicative conventions can bootstrap from scratch without any top-down design, mirroring the conventionalisation mechanisms thought to underlie natural language origins. In that sense, they serve as a naturalistic testbed for theories of how writing and speech systems first emerged.
More in Writing Systems 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced
