Dioctophymosis
Rare parasitic infection destroying one kidney via giant kidney worm.
Dioctophymosis is a parasitic infection caused by the giant kidney worm, Dioctophyme renale, a nematode that primarily infects the kidneys of fish-eating mammals. In humans, it is rare but can lead to destruction of one kidney, typically without fatal outcome due to the compensatory function of the other kidney.
Quick Facts
- Genus
- Dioctophyme
- Species
- renale
Facts from the source article.
Lore & Background
Dioctophymosis results from ingestion of raw or undercooked freshwater fish or frogs containing third-stage larvae of Dioctophyme renale. The larvae penetrate the intestinal lining, migrate to the liver, mature for about 50 days, then move to the kidney—typically the right one. Adult females can reach up to 103 cm in length, making it the largest nematode known to infect humans. The worms destroy kidney tissue through fibrosis, but global renal dysfunction is limited because the unaffected kidney compensates.
Reader's Guide
Dioctophymosis is significant as a rare but illustrative example of a parasitic infection that can mimic renal cancer on imaging, leading to unnecessary radical nephrectomy. Its history includes discovery in 1583 and resolution of genus name controversy by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature in 1987. Archaeological evidence from Neolithic Switzerland (3384–3370 BC) and Iron Age England (900 BC) shows higher prevalence before modern cooking practices. Prevention is straightforward: thorough cooking of freshwater fish. No standard drug therapy exists, though one case was treated with Ivermectin. The infection underscores the importance of dietary habits in zoonotic disease transmission.
Did You Know?
- Dioctophyme renale eggs were found in six human coprolites from a Neolithic site in Switzerland, dated 3384–3370 BC.
- The female worm can grow up to 103 cm long and 12 mm wide, making it the largest nematode to infect humans.
- Only about 30–35 human cases of dioctophymiasis had been reported worldwide as of a 2019 review, with 22 in China.
- The spelling of the genus name (Dioctophyme vs. Dioctophyma) was disputed until resolved by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature in 1987.
More in Zoonoses 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced
