Display Standards Codexery

Composite artifact colors

Extra colors from composite video artifacts on 1970s–80s home computers.

Composite artifact colors

Composite artifact colors is a technique that allowed some 1970s and 1980s home computers to display extra colors beyond their built-in hardware palettes. This was achieved by connecting the machine to an NTSC television or monitor via composite video and carefully controlling the horizontal position of pixels on screen. Because this method reduced the effective horizontal resolution, it was used mainly for games rather than text. The technique was most common on the IBM PC (with CGA graphics), the TRS-80 Color Computer, the Apple II, and Atari 8-bit computers, and was notably employed in the *Ultima* role-playing games. Many software titles, such as *King's Quest* for the IBM PC, offered a choice between "RGB mode" and "Color Composite mode."

On PAL displays, the effect also occurs but produces a more limited range of colors. Results vary depending on the specific PAL variant: with PAL-M or PAL-N, color artifacts similar to those on NTSC may be possible.

It is important to distinguish artifact colors from horizontal blurring. Blurring is a general effect of using a composite connection, where new colors appear due to the mixing of adjacent pixel values. The exact mix depends on the saturation and specific colors of the original pixels. However, this blurring effect can be exploited through dither patterns to generate new intermediate palette colors on machines with sufficiently high resolution, such as the ZX Spectrum, Mega Drive/Genesis, NES/Famicom, or Amiga.

**Technical details**

In the NTSC broadcast standard, the color subcarrier frequency is exactly 227.5 times the line frequency, meaning each line contains 227.5 subcarrier cycles. This causes the subcarrier's apparent phase to reverse on every line, which—when viewed on a monochrome display that does not filter out color information—makes solid colors appear as a checkerboard-like pattern.

Computers like the Apple II and the CGA video card for the IBM PC output a signal that approximates this broadcast standard. Both systems stretch each line to a full 228 cycles of the color subcarrier, which is within most displays' tolerances. As a result, the image displays clearly, but the pattern from solid colors becomes straight vertical stripes instead of a checkerboard.

Common machines
IBM PC (CGA), TRS-80 Color Computer, Apple II, Atari 8-bit computers
Pixel clock
14.318 MHz (four times NTSC subcarrier)
Cga effective resolution early
160×200 with 16 colors
Cga max colors demonstrated
1024 (via text mode tweak, effective resolution 80×100)
Trs-80 coco effective resolution
128×192 four color mode (from 256×192 two color mode)
Notable game series
Ultima role-playing video games

Lore & Background

Composite artifact colors were most common on the IBM PC (with CGA graphics), TRS-80 Color Computer, Apple II, and Atari 8-bit computers, and used by the Ultima role-playing video games. Software titles such as King's Quest for the IBM PC usually provided an option to select between 'RGB mode' and 'Color Composite mode'. On PAL displays the effect is also present but generates more limited colors; depending on the exact PAL system (PAL-M or PAL-N), color artifacts similar to NTSC might be possible. Although related, artifact colors are not the same as horizontal blurring, which is a general effect of composite connection that creates new colors due to a mix of adjacent horizontal pixel values.

Reader's Guide

The technique was significant because it allowed programmers to overcome the limited hardware color palettes of early computers, producing new colors by exploiting the NTSC color subcarrier's phase relationships. On the IBM PC CGA, both the standard 320×200 four-color and 640×200 color-on-black graphics modes could be used, with early efforts yielding a usable resolution of 160×200 with 16 colors. Later demonstrations increased the maximum number of colors the CGA could display simultaneously to 1024 using a text mode tweak. On the TRS-80 Color Computer, the 256×192 two-color mode became a 128×192 four-color mode with black, orange, blue, and white. The technique was generally only used with NTSC, as PAL's line-to-line phase changes made the tricks infeasible, and SECAM's frequency modulation required far more precise timing. Artifact colors should not be confused with horizontal blurring, which is dependent on original pixel values and more pronounced at higher resolutions with saturated colors.

Did You Know?

The Subcarrier Trick

The technique exploited a specific relationship between pixel timing and the NTSC color subcarrier. In broadcast NTSC, each line contains 227.5 subcarrier cycles, causing the apparent phase to reverse every line. Early computers like the Apple II and IBM's CGA card stretched each line to a full 228 cycles, which stayed within display tolerances but produced straight vertical stripes instead of checkerboard patterns. Because each horizontal pixel position maintained a constant phase relationship to the subcarrier, lighting up a pixel at a specific index always produced the same color effect. Both machines used a 14.318 MHz pixel clock—exactly four times the subcarrier frequency—meaning each line was 912 pixel cycles long. With only 560 addressable pixels on the Apple II or 640 on CGA, each pixel could occupy one of four predefined phase positions relative to the color burst, letting programmers construct a fake subcarrier that the display interpreted as color.

Games, Machines, and the Mode Switch

This technique found its primary home in video games rather than text display, since the pixel manipulation inherently reduced effective horizontal resolution. The most common platforms were the IBM PC with its CGA graphics card, the TRS-80 Color Computer, the Apple II, and Atari 8-bit machines. Notable software titles like the Ultima role-playing series and King's Quest for the IBM PC leveraged the expanded palette. Because the effect depended on the viewer's display, these programs typically offered a menu choice between RGB mode and Color Composite mode, letting users select whichever suited their monitor. The CGA card's native color capability added another layer: by forming patterns from its built-in colors, the hardware's real subcarrier would interfere with the pixel-pattern-generated fake one, producing entirely new colors the display interpreted as unique hues beyond the card's standard palette.

Not Blurring, Not Dithering

A common misconception conflates artifact colors with horizontal blurring, but the two are fundamentally different phenomena. Blurring is a general side effect of any composite video connection, where limited bandwidth in both luminance and chrominance causes adjacent pixel values to average together, creating new intermediate colors. The exact result depends entirely on the saturation and specific hues of the neighboring pixels. This effect grows more pronounced at higher resolutions and with saturated colors, particularly blue and red. Game artists on machines with high resolution but limited palettes—such as the ZX Spectrum, Mega Drive/Genesis, NES/Famicom, and Amiga—exploited blurring deliberately through dithering patterns to generate intermediate palette colors. Artifact colors, by contrast, are arbitrary and position-dependent, not derived from neighboring pixel values.

Why NTSC Won the Day

Although color information technically resides within the same bandwidth as luminance in every analog television system, making artifact colors theoretically possible in all of them, the practical reality favored NTSC exclusively. In the PAL system, the subcarrier phase is interpreted differently from line to line, and the color burst phase must strictly alternate on successive lines, rendering the pixel-position tricks described for NTSC infeasible. SECAM takes a different approach entirely, using frequency modulation for color, which would demand timing far more precise than simply synchronizing a pixel clock to a subcarrier frequency. The one partial exception within PAL was that PAL-M and PAL-N variants could sometimes produce color artifacts resembling NTSC results. For these reasons, the technique was generally confined to NTSC displays, with PAL screens offering only a more limited set of artifact colors when the effect appeared at all.

Gallery

Frequently Asked Questions

What are composite artifact colors?

Composite artifact colors is a display trick from the 1970s and 1980s that let certain home computers show more hues than their stock hardware palettes allowed. It worked by feeding a composite video signal into an NTSC television and precisely timing where each pixel landed on the scan line, coaxing the receiver into producing extra colors from subcarrier interactions.

How did composite artifact colors work technically?

The pixel clock ran at 14.318 MHz—exactly four times the NTSC color subcarrier—so shifting a pixel's horizontal position by a fraction of a scan line could produce a new perceived hue. Because the effect depended on exact subcarrier-to-pixel alignment, it was extremely timing-sensitive and only reliable on NTSC displays.

Which computers could use composite artifact colors?

The technique was most commonly seen on the IBM PC in CGA mode, the TRS-80 Color Computer, the Apple II, and the Atari 8-bit family. Since it sacrificed horizontal resolution, developers almost exclusively used it for games rather than text screens.

What resolution trade-off did composite artifact colors impose?

On CGA, the early artifact-color mode dropped effective resolution to 160×200 while unlocking 16 colors, and a text-mode hack demonstrated up to 1024 colors at just 80×100. On the TRS-80 CoCo, the four-color artifact mode halved horizontal resolution from 256×192 down to 128×192.

What notable game series used composite artifact colors?

The Ultima role-playing series is the most well-known franchise that leaned on composite artifact colors to enrich its on-screen palettes. The technique let those titles display a richer, more varied color look than the stock hardware palette would otherwise permit.

More in Display Standards 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →