Chernobyl: The HBO Miniseries Codexery

Critical Reception

How critics received the miniseries.

Last updated

Chernobyl received widespread critical acclaim when it was broadcast in 2019. Reviewers praised its performances, atmosphere, screenplay, cinematography and musical score. On Rotten Tomatoes it has an approval rating of 95% based on 103 reviews, and on Metacritic a weighted average score of 82 out of 100.

Last updated 2026-09-29 from the source article.

Lore & Background

Several reviewers read the series as a story about the present. Writers for The Atlantic, The Washington Post and the BBC saw parallels with contemporary society in its focus on the power of information and on the mistakes that dishonest leaders can make. One called it a grim study of the cost of devaluing the truth; another praised it for showing what happens when lying is standard and authority is abused.

Not every response was favourable. An article in the magazine Jacobin argued that the series revels in the failure of the historical alternative to capitalism and so reinforces the status quo.

Reader's Guide

The series also travelled in unexpected ways. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, internet users in China drew parallels between the Soviet response to the disaster and the first handling of the outbreak by their own government. The page for the series on the site Douban, which had more than 200,000 ratings and an average of 9.6 out of 10, was then taken down.

The series was released on Blu-ray and DVD on October 1, 2019, and in a 4K edition on December 1, 2020.

Did You Know?

A dramatisation, not the historical record. For the real event see Chernobyl Disaster: the real 1986 event

More in Reception

Elsewhere in Chernobyl: The HBO Miniseries

Sources

Compiled from Wikipedia and the sources listed below. Text from Wikipedia is available under CC BY-SA 4.0; this entry is adapted from it.

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →