Marriage And Kinship Codexery

Levirate marriage

A marriage custom obligating a brother to marry his deceased sibling's widow.

Levirate marriage

Levirate marriage is a custom where a man is required to marry his deceased brother's widow. This practice appears in societies with strong clan systems that forbid marrying outside the clan. The word "levirate" comes from the Latin *lēvir*, meaning "husband's brother," and has no connection to Leviticus or the Levites.

At its best, levirate marriage can protect a widow and her children by ensuring they have a male provider. It is often found in patriarchal societies where women depend on men for support, are under male authority, or are considered property. The practice helps preserve the clan and was especially important in ancient times, such as in the Ancient Near East, and continues in parts of the world today. Having children through such a marriage allows for land inheritance, which brings security and status. A levirate marriage might only take place if the deceased man died without children, to continue his family line. Anthropologist Ruth Mace also noted that in parts of Africa, where younger brothers inherit widows, this practice can lower population growth because these men then marry older, less fertile women.

In Judaism, a form of levirate marriage called *yibbum* appears in Deuteronomy 25:5–10. It permits and encourages a brother to marry his childless brother's widow. Either party can refuse, but then both must undergo *halizah*, a ceremony renouncing the marriage. Sexual relations with a brother's wife are otherwise forbidden in Leviticus 18 and 20. Over time, Jewish custom shifted from *yibbum* to *halizah*. Today, most Jewish communities, and Israel by order of the Chief Rabbinate, prohibit *yibbum*. This trend began in the Mishnah, with Abba Shaul stating that *halizah* takes precedence over levirate marriage. The Babylonian Talmud later said that since people no longer have the proper intent for fulfilling the commandment, *halizah* is preferred. However, the Jewish community in Yemen practiced levirate marriage until they immigrated to Israel. In 1950, the Israeli Rabbinate and the Chief Sephardic Rabbi banned it among Yemenites, citing a need for uniformity, and only permitted those already married through levirate marriage from outside the country.

In Islam, Sharia law sets rules for marriage, including who can marry whom. The Quran does not forbid a man from marrying his brother's widow, but insists it be treated as a normal marriage, requiring the wife's consent and an additional *mahr*. The Quran says, "O you who have believed, it is not lawful for you to inherit women by compulsion. And do not make difficulties for them in order to take [back] part of what you gave them unless they commit a clear immorality. And live with them in kindness." While not an Islamic tradition itself, levirate marriage has been widespread in the Muslim world. Most scholars deem it permissible with the wife's consent, and some even recommend it depending on the situation. It has recently faced strict scrutiny in places like Afghanistan under the Taliban.

In Eurasia, the levirate custom was revived in Scythia when a family faced shaky economic conditions. During World War II, it was resurrected in Central Asia, where adult sons and brothers of the deceased felt responsible for his dependents. One would marry the widow and adopt her children if any. Among the Northeastern Caucasus Huns, the custom survived until the 7th century CE. The Armenian historian Movses Kalankatuatsi noted that the Savirs, a Hunnish tribe, were usually monogamous but sometimes a man would take his brother's widow as a polygynous wife. Dagestani historian Ludmila Gmyrya claims the practice survived into the 1950s. Kalankatuatsi described that among the Huns, women had high social status, so a widow could choose whether to remarry. Her new husband could be a brother or even a stepson, with age difference not mattering. Hungarians also practiced levirate marriage. Koppány's rebellion against King Stephen I, which included a claim to marry Sarolt, the widow of his relative Géza, was seen as incestuous by 14th-century chronicles but was in line with pagan custom.

In India, in 2017, the Indian Army removed a rule that restricted monetary allowances for widows of gallantry awardees if she married someone other than her late husband's brother. Previously, the allowance continued until her death or remarriage, unless the new husband was the brother.

Etymology
From Latin lēvir, 'husband's brother'
Associated with
Patriarchal societies, strong clan structures
Historical prevalence
Ancient Near East, parts of Africa, Eurasia, Asia
Key rationale
Protection for widow and children, continuation of family line, inheritance of land
Modern status
Declined in Judaism; permitted in Islam with wife's consent; practiced in various regions

Lore & Background

Levirate marriage can, at its most positive, serve as protection for the widow and her children, ensuring that they have a male provider and protector. It can be a positive in a society where women must rely on men to provide for them, especially in societies where women are under the authority of, dependent on, in servitude to or regarded as possessions of their husbands, and to ensure the survival of the clan. The practice is strongly associated with patriarchal societies and was extremely important in ancient times, remaining so today in parts of the world. Having children enables the inheritance of land, which offers security and status. A levirate marriage might only occur if a man died childless, in order to continue his family line. Anthropologist Ruth Mace also found that the practice of widow inheritance by younger brothers, common in many parts of Africa, serves to reduce population growth, as these men will be forced to marry older (and hence, less fertile) women.

Reader's Guide

Levirate marriage appears across diverse cultures and time periods, from the Hebrew Bible's yibbum to Islamic permissibility, and from Scythia to modern Africa and Asia. In Judaism, the practice has largely been replaced by halizah, a ceremony of renunciation, and is prohibited in Israel by mandate of the Chief Rabbinate. In Islam, while not a tradition in itself, it is deemed permissible with the wife's consent and has recently come under strict scrutiny in parts of the world like Afghanistan under the Taliban. The custom has been documented among the Kurds, Kyrgyz, Manchu, various African societies, and in historical Korea and Japan. The practice's significance lies in its role in maintaining clan structure, providing for widows and children, and controlling inheritance and population, though it has declined in many areas due to legal and social changes.

Did You Know?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is levirate marriage?

It is a marriage arrangement in which a man's brother is expected to take his deceased sibling's widow as his own wife. The custom typically appears in tightly structured, clan-based societies that restrict marriage to outside the group.

Does the word 'levirate' come from Leviticus?

No. The term traces back to the Latin word lēvir, meaning simply 'husband's brother.' It has no connection to the biblical book of Leviticus or to the tribe of Levites.

Why did communities adopt levirate marriage?

The practice served several practical purposes: it kept a widow and her children within the family's protection, ensured the deceased man's lineage continued, and prevented family land from passing to outsiders.

In which regions was levirate marriage historically common?

The custom appeared across the ancient Near East, various parts of Africa, and stretches of Eurasia and Asia. It was most prevalent in societies organized around strong patriarchal clan structures.

Is levirate marriage still practiced today?

Its use has largely faded in Jewish communities, though Islamic law still permits it provided the widow consents. Some regions continue the practice in varying forms, but it is far less widespread than in earlier centuries.

More in Marriage And Kinship 1-18

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →