Groundhog Day (film)
A weatherman relives the same day until he gets it right.
A cynical TV weatherman covering the annual Groundhog Day event in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, finds himself stuck reliving February 2 over and over in this 1993 fantasy romantic comedy. Directed and co-written by Harold Ramis with Danny Rubin, the film stars Bill Murray, Andie MacDowell, and Chris Elliott.
Quick Facts
- Director
- Harold Ramis
- Producer
- Trevor Albert, Harold Ramis
- Screenplay
- Danny Rubin, Harold Ramis
- Story
- Danny Rubin
- Starring
- Bill Murray
- Andie MacDowell
- Chris Elliott
- Music
- George Fenton
- Cinematography
- John Bailey
- Editing
- Pembroke J. Herring
Facts from the source article.
Did You Know?
- Punxsutawney Phil is portrayed by a groundhog known as Scooter.
- The film was adapted into a 2016 musical and inspired a 2019 video game sequel, Groundhog Day: Like Father Like Son.
- Director Harold Ramis cameos as a neurologist.
Production
The original idea for Groundhog Day came to writer Danny Rubin in 1990. While waiting in a theater for a film to start, he was reading Anne Rice's book The Vampire Lestat and began musing about vampiric immortality and what one would do with their time if it was limitless. He questioned if and when immortality would become boring or pointless, and how a person would change over time, especially if they were incapable of substantial change. Having recently sold his first script for what would become the thriller film Hear No Evil, his agent prompted him to develop a calling-card script that he could use to gain meetings with producers. Rubin began work on his idea of a man changing over eternal life, but quickly realized that the idea was impractical because of the expense of depicting historical and future events. At this point, Rubin recalled a brief story concept he had written two years earlier that followed a man who woke every morning to find it was the same day repeating. Rubin married the two ideas to create the outline for Groundhog Day. By portraying eternity as a repeating cycle instead of a straight line through history, he eliminated the production cost of constantly changing settings. He believed that the repetition also offered him more dramatic and comedic possibilities. Rubin opened a calendar and picked the next nearest holiday, February 2, Groundhog Day. He saw it as a date with story potential because it was a recognized holiday without much widespread attention. Setting the story in Punxsutawney provided a small area in which to trap Phil Connors, while reporting on the event gave the character a reason to visit. Rubin took the main character's name from Punxsutawney Phil.
Reception
Critics largely praised Groundhog Day, with CinemaScore audiences giving it a B+ average. The film marked a notable departure from what Bill Murray and Harold Ramis had done before. Kenneth Turan called it gentle, endearing, and small-scale. Hal Hinson declared it the best American comedy since Tootsie, noting Ramis’s sharp comedic timing and a clever, unpretentious plot. Reviewers likened it to a mix of It’s a Wonderful Life and The Twilight Zone. Roger Ebert compared it to Scrooged, another Murray film about a selfish man turning selfless, but said Groundhog Day offered optimism instead of grim discontent. Everyone agreed the movie had an obvious moral, but opinions split on how it was handled. Desson Thomson found it intriguing at first but felt it slid into a Hollywood-style morality tale. Turan saw it as starting traditionally but winning the audience over with earnestness and romantic innocence. Hinson appreciated that the moral never insulted viewers’ intelligence or demanded they abandon cynicism, and noted that Phil becomes a better person without ceasing to be a jerk. Janet Maslin observed a balance between sentimentality and nihilism. The Hollywood Reporter liked how the film endorsed small-town values, while The New Statesman said it appealed to both cynicism and optimism.
Post-release
Despite its relative success, a sequel was ruled out by November 1993. Groundhog Day was one of the films credited with helping to reverse Columbia's failures at the box office, alongside the 1992 films Bram Stoker's Dracula, A Few Good Men and A League of Their Own. Shortly after its release, author Richard A. Lupoff threatened legal action against the filmmakers, alleging the film copied his short story 12:01 P.M. and its associated 1990 short film adaptation about a man stuck in a time loop. The case was never formally filed as the film's production company refused to support legal action. Similarly, author Leon Arden attempted legal action, claiming the film plagiarized his novel One Fine Day, which he had unsuccessfully pitched as a script to Columbia Pictures, about a man repeating April 15. The judge ruled against Arden. Murray initially hated the finished Groundhog Day. In a 1993 interview, he said that he wanted to focus on the comedy and the underlying theme of people repeating their lives out of fear of change. Ramis wanted to focus on the redeeming power of love. Even so, Murray agreed that Ramis had ultimately been right to do so. The film marked the end of Ramis and Murray's nearly 20-year long partnership.
Analysis
Just how long Phil Connors was stuck in his time loop is a question that has sparked plenty of debate. Harold Ramis initially said he thought it was about ten years, but when a blogger calculated it as roughly nine, Ramis disagreed with both that figure and his own. He argued that mastering something like ice sculpting or French takes at least a decade, and factoring in wasted years, the total was more like 30 or 40. Another estimate, based on the 10,000-hour rule for expertise, counts the loops shown or mentioned on screen and how much time Phil could study each day, arriving at about 12,400 days—nearly 34 years. In Danny Rubin's original script, Phil himself guesses he has been trapped for 70 to 80 years, using books to keep track. Ramis, who was born Jewish but later adopted a Buddhist outlook through his second wife, noted that Buddhist doctrine says a soul needs roughly 10,000 years to evolve to the next level. Rubin stated in 2005 that the studio wanted to say the loop lasted two weeks, but for him the point was that the audience had to feel an immense, grinding duration—something like a hundred years, a whole lifetime. Ryan Gilbey, in his book on the film, considered this vagueness one of the movie's most striking features: just as the loop has no explanation, its length is simply whatever it takes for Phil to become a better person.
More in Films About Time Loops
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced