Turn-Based Strategy Games, Further Titles Codexery

Annals of Rome

A turn-based strategy game of survival in the Late Roman Empire.

Annals of Rome is a turn-based strategy game from Personal Software Services, who both developed and published it. It first came out in the United Kingdom in 1986 for the ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC, and Atari ST, then later appeared in Germany on the Commodore 64 in 1987 and the Amiga in 1988. The game takes place during the Late Roman Empire, and the player’s goal is to hold out as long as possible against rebellious European states.

The gameplay uses two separate windows. In the first, the player manages troop movement, placing forces within Roman territory or launching attacks against computer-controlled opponents. This screen also displays each player’s troop numbers, along with the Roman state’s inflation, popularity, and national score, plus the human player’s personal score. The final action in this window is setting the tax rate, which can be adjusted between 1.0 and 2.0 percent—higher taxes drive up inflation. The second window lets the player assign command of Roman armies to any of the 21 Senate members. Each senator is listed with three numbers: the first two represent military ability and loyalty, while the third shows age. If the government’s popularity drops below 2 (on a scale from -5 to +5), armies led by disloyal commanders may revolt and attempt to seize Rome. If such a revolt succeeds before 50 BC, the rebel becomes dictator; after that date, he becomes emperor, starting a dynasty.

Reviews at the time noted the game’s poor graphics and interface, even by 1986 standards, but Crash magazine still gave it an 85% rating in 1987. Popular Computing Weekly called it a “perfect choice if you take your strategy games seriously” in November 1986. This popularity led to conversions for all major computer platforms of the era. Personal Software Services initially released it for the Commodore 64, Spectrum, Amstrad CPC, and Atari ST by September 1987, followed by PC and Amiga versions. Today, it is regarded as a forgotten classic.

Computer Gaming World gave a positive review, praising innovative features like variable turn length, but noted the game felt unfinished and unpolished, pointing out the lack of victory conditions and a poor save system. In 1990, the magazine awarded it three-plus out of five stars, saying that despite the weak graphics and seemingly incomplete feel, “it succeeds on many levels,” especially in the superior 16-bit versions.

Quick Facts

Developer
Personal Software Services
Released
1986
Genre
Strategy
Modes
Single-player
Platforms
ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC, Commodore 64, Atari ST, Amiga, MS-DOS, Amstrad PCW

Facts from the source article.

Lore & Background

Annals of Rome was developed and published by Personal Software Services, first appearing in the United Kingdom in 1986 for the ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC and Atari ST. It later saw German releases for the Commodore 64 in 1987 and the Amiga in 1988. The game's objective is to survive as long as possible against rebelling European states within the Late Roman Empire.

Gameplay is presented in two windows. The first window handles troop movement, allowing the player to place forces within the Roman state or attack computer opponents. This window displays the number of forces for all players, inflation, popularity, national score of the Roman state, and the human player's score. The player then sets the tax rate between 1.0 and 2.0 percent, with higher taxes causing higher inflation. The second window presents 21 Senate members, each listed with numbers indicating their military ability, loyalty, and age. The player assigns command of Roman armies to these senators. If the government's popularity falls below 2 (on a scale from -5 to +5), armies with disloyal commanders may revolt and attempt to take Rome. A successful rebel before 50 BC becomes dictator; after that date, he becomes emperor, leading to a dynasty.

Reception was mixed. Despite poor graphics and interface even for 1986, Crash magazine gave the game an 85% rating in 1987. Popular Computing Weekly called it a "perfect choice if you take your strategy games seriously" in November 1986. Computer Gaming World noted innovative mechanics such as variable turn length, but felt the game was unfinished and unpolished, citing a lack of victory conditions and a poor save mechanism. In 1990 the magazine gave it three-plus out of five stars, stating that despite poor graphics and an incomplete nature, "it succeeds on many levels," especially in the superior 16-bit versions. By 1993 the magazine gave it two-plus stars. Orson Scott Card wrote in Compute! that the programmers did an excellent job of recreating Roman history, but that sales would suffer because it "looks like it was programmed in the Bronze Age."

Reader's Guide

Annals of Rome is notable for its ambitious simulation of Late Roman Empire politics and military management, despite technical limitations. The game's two-window interface, combining troop movement with Senate command assignments, was considered innovative for its time. The variable turn length mechanic received positive attention from Computer Gaming World, though the same review noted the game felt unfinished due to the absence of explicit victory conditions and a flawed save system. The game's popularity led to conversions across all major computer platforms of its day, including the Commodore 64, ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC, Atari ST, PC, and Amiga. Today it is regarded as a forgotten classic. Critical reception was divided: while some praised its strategic depth and historical recreation, others criticized its dated graphics and unpolished execution. The 16-bit versions were considered superior. The game's legacy lies in its attempt to blend historical simulation with turn-based strategy, offering a unique challenge of survival against internal rebellion and external threats, even if its presentation and completeness fell short of contemporary standards.

Did You Know?

More in Turn-Based Strategy Games, Further Titles 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →