Hundred Years' War
The Hundred Years' War was not a single continuous battle but a long, stop-start series of conflicts between England and France, lasting from 1337 to 1453. It also involved a civil war within France. The trouble began with feudal arguments over who controlled the Duchy of Aquitaine, but the immediate spark was King Edward III of England deciding he had a right to the French throne. What followed was a much bigger struggle—military, economic, and political—that pulled in factions from across Western Europe and was driven by growing national pride on both sides.
Historians later gave it the name "Hundred Years' War," even though it actually spanned 116 years. The fighting was often interrupted by outside events, like the Black Death, and by long truces. Over the course of the conflict, five generations of kings from two rival families fought for control of France, which at the time was the richest and most populous kingdom in Western Europe. The war left a lasting mark: both sides developed new military technology and tactics, including professional standing armies and artillery, which permanently changed how wars were fought. Chivalry reached its peak during this period and then faded. Stronger national identities formed in both England and France, and their governments became more centralized, eventually emerging as global powers.
The war is usually split into three phases, separated by truces: the Edwardian War (1337–1360), the Caroline War (1369–1389), and the Lancastrian War (1415–1453). Each side gathered many allies. The English had early successes, but in the end, the French House of Valois kept control of the Kingdom of France. The English and French monarchies remained separate, though English and later British kings continued to call themselves sovereigns of France until 1802.
The deeper roots of the conflict go back to the crisis of 14th-century Europe. Tensions had been building for centuries, ever since the Norman Conquest of 1066 put a French-speaking duke on the English throne. From then on, English kings held lands in France, making them vassals of the French king, which caused ongoing friction. In 1328, King Charles IV of France died with no sons or brothers, creating a succession crisis. A similar problem in 1316 had already led to a rule that women could not inherit the French crown. Charles's closest male relative was his nephew, Edward III of England, whose mother Isabella was Charles's sister. Isabella claimed the throne for her son, but French nobles rejected that, saying she could not pass on a right she didn't have. Instead, they chose Philip, Count of Valois, a cousin on the male side. Edward protested but eventually accepted and paid homage for Gascony. However, further disagreements led Philip to take back Gascony in 1337, and Edward responded by renewing his claim to the French throne—this time with an army.
In the early years, the English, led by Edward III and his son Edward the Black Prince, won major victories at Crécy (1346) and Poitiers (1356), where they captured King John II of France. By 1378, under King Charles V and the commander Bertrand du Guesclin, the French had taken back most of the lands England had gained in the Treaty of Brétigny (1360), leaving the English with only a few cities. Both kingdoms then faced serious problems. The Black Death (1347–1351) killed 6 to 12 million people in France (30–60% of the population) and about 2–3 million in England. This caused labor shortages, economic collapse, and social unrest. The war and plague together led to widespread poverty and weakened royal authority. England recovered from these crises sooner than France did.
Later, King Henry V of England took advantage of King Charles VI of France's mental illness and a French civil war between the Armagnacs and Burgundians to restart the conflict. Big English wins at Agincourt (1415) and Verneuil (1424), plus an alliance with the Burgundians, made an English victory seem possible and kept the war going for decades. But various factors stopped that from happening.
- Conflict
- Hundred Years' War
- Belligerents
- Kingdom of England vs. Kingdom of France
- Outcome
- French victory; England retained only the Pale of Calais
Quick Facts
- Conflict
- Hundred Years' War
- Part Of
- the crisis of the late Middle Ages and the Anglo-French Wars
- Location
- France, the Low Countries, Great Britain, the Iberian Peninsula
- Result
- French victory
- Territory
- England loses all continental possessions except for the Pale of Calais.
- Combatant1
- Kingdom of France loyal to the House of Valois
- Combatant1A
- Burgundian State (1337–1419; 1435–1453) · Duchy of Brittany · Crown of Castile · Kingdom of Scotland · Welsh rebels · Crown of Aragon
- Combatant2
- Kingdom of England / Kingdom of France loyal to the House of Plantagenet
- Combatant2A
- Burgundian State (1419–1435) · Duchy of Brittany · Kingdom of Portugal · Kingdom of Navarre · Duchy of Gascony
- Casualties1
- 185,250 (approx.) French and English soldiers killed in combat, ~556,000 total French and English military deaths
Facts from the source article.
Lore & Background
The Hundred Years' War was a series of intermittent conflicts between the kingdoms of England and France, also involving a French civil war, spanning over 116 years. Its appearance in European history is defined by a struggle between two rival dynasties for control of the French throne, which at the time presided over the wealthiest and most populous kingdom in Western Europe. The war’s range extended beyond the two primary kingdoms, drawing in factions from across Western Europe and including dynastically related conflicts in Spain and Belgium, making it the longest military conflict in European history. Its habitat was the late Middle Ages, a period marked by the crisis of the 14th century, including the catastrophic Black Death plague, which caused massive population loss and economic disruption in both France and England. Defining characteristics include the emergence of the conflict from feudal disputes over the Duchy of Aquitaine, triggered by a claim to the French throne by Edward III of England. The war is commonly divided into three phases—the Edwardian, Caroline, and Lancastrian—separated by truces and external interruptions. It spurred innovations in military technology and tactics, such as professional standing armies and artillery, which permanently changed European warfare. Chivalry reached its height during this conflict and subsequently declined. Stronger national identities formed in both kingdoms, which became more centralized and gradually emerged as global powers. The French House of Valois ultimately retained control of the kingdom, and the English and French monarchies remained separate, though English monarchs styled themselves as sovereigns of France until 1802.
Reader's Guide
The Hundred Years' War had a lasting effect on European history. Both sides produced innovations in military technology and tactics, including professional standing armies and artillery, permanently changing European warfare. Chivalry reached its height during the conflict and subsequently declined. Stronger national identities took root in both kingdoms, which became more centralized and gradually emerged as global powers. The war precipitated the creation of the first standing armies in Western Europe since the Western Roman Empire. By the war's end, feudal armies had mainly been replaced by professional troops, and aristocratic dominance yielded to a democratization of manpower and weapons. The economic consequences led to a decline in trade and high taxes, contributing to civil disorder, including the Wars of the Roses in England.
Did You Know?
- The war included related conflicts such as the War of the Breton Succession and the Castilian Civil War.
Roots in Feudal Rivalry and a Broken Succession
The seeds of what would become Europe's longest military conflict were planted centuries before the first arrow was loosed. This tangled web of feudal obligation over territories like the Duchy of Aquitaine created friction for generations. His closest male heir was Edward III of England, whose mother Isabella was Charles's own sister. What followed would span five generations of monarchs and reshape the political map of Western Europe.
Forging a New Kind of War
Across its three great phases — the Edwardian, Caroline, and Lancastrian wars — the conflict served as an unprecedented laboratory for military transformation. But the war's deepest legacy lay in the innovations it forced upon both sides. Professional standing armies and the deployment of artillery emerged as tools that permanently altered how European nations waged war. Simultaneously, the romantic ideal of chivalry reached its zenith on these battlefields before entering a long decline, signaling the end of an era in military culture.
Plague, Poverty, and the Shattering of Order
In France, the plague claimed an estimated six to twelve million lives — a staggering thirty to sixty percent of the total population — triggering catastrophic labour shortages, economic collapse, and deep social dislocation. England, while also struck, suffered roughly two to three million deaths, a severe but comparatively smaller blow. The combined pressures of plague and prolonged warfare generated widespread poverty, major civil unrest, and a significant weakening of royal authority in both kingdoms. England managed to resolve these crises earlier than France, but the scars ran deep. The conflict itself was anything but continuous; it was an intermittent struggle frequently interrupted by truces and external catastrophes like the pandemic. This stop-start nature meant that the war's economic and social devastation compounded over decades rather than arriving in a single catastrophic burst, reshaping the social fabric of Western Europe in ways that outlasted the fighting itself.
Forging Nations from the Ashes of War
Perhaps the most profound and lasting consequence of the Hundred Years' War was not territorial but psychological: the crystallization of national identity in both England and France. Before the conflict, loyalty was often directed toward a lord or a dynasty rather than an abstract nation. The prolonged struggle, fueled by emerging nationalism on both sides, forged a stronger sense of collective belonging that drove both kingdoms toward greater centralization of power. The French monarchy under the House of Valois ultimately retained control of the Kingdom of France, while the English crown, despite losing its continental ambitions, consolidated its position in the British Isles. Both polities gradually emerged as global powers in the centuries that followed. The very name "Hundred Years' War" was coined by later historians, who also folded in dynastically related conflicts in Spain and Belgium, making it the longest military conflict in European history.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Hundred Years' War?
It was a prolonged conflict between the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of France, rooted in feudal disputes over the Duchy of Aquitaine. The crisis escalated when Edward III of England pressed a claim to the French throne, transforming a regional grievance into a full-scale war.
What caused the Hundred Years' War?
The immediate spark was Edward III's assertion of a right to the French crown, but the deeper tensions had long simmered over English feudal holdings in Aquitaine. Over time the dispute widened into a military, economic, and political struggle that pulled in factions from across Western Europe.
Who were the main belligerents in the Hundred Years' War?
The two principal opponents were the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of France. As the fighting dragged on, various other factions throughout Western Europe became entangled, turning a bilateral succession dispute into a broader continental conflict.
How did the Hundred Years' War end?
France ultimately emerged victorious, and England was left retaining only the Pale of Calais on the French coast. The war concluded in 1453 after more than a century of shifting alliances, battlefield reversals, and internal upheaval on both sides.
Why is the Hundred Years' War historically significant?
It is widely seen as a major catalyst for the rise of national identity and emerging nationalism in both England and France. The conflict also dismantled older feudal loyalties and reshaped the political and economic landscape of Western Europe for generations to come.
More in Major Wars 1-20
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
