Literary Forms & Tropes Codexery

Canon (fiction)

Official body of works in a fictional universe.

Canon (fiction)

Canon, in the context of fiction, refers to the body of works set in a particular fictional world that are widely considered official or authoritative, especially those created by the original author or developer. It is contrasted with derivative works such as fan fiction, and its definition is often disputed, with no consensus on who has the authority to decide what is canonical. The question of canonicity is particularly significant when franchises are rebooted or re-imagined, as it shapes the viewer’s experience. Copyright holders frequently assert their authority to declare what is canonical, sometimes using this power to erase or retcon material previously approved by a setting’s original creator. In the Star Trek franchise, for example, the official website defines canon as events occurring within the live-action television episodes and films, explicitly excluding tie-in novels, comic books, and video games, though it acknowledges that elements from those excluded sources have later been introduced into the television series. The Star Wars canon was originally divided into tiers by Lucasfilm, with live-action films and certain television series at the top, superseding other material in case of contradiction. After a corporate acquisition, Lucasfilm reclassified most earlier Expanded Universe material as a non-canonical “Legends” continuity. The makers of Doctor Who have generally avoided formal pronouncements on canonicity. In literature, the canonical status of works by an original writer but not the original publisher can be debated, as copyright was historically exercised by publishers rather than authors. Original publishers or literary estates have sometimes posthumously approved continuation novels, such as *The Royal Book of Oz*, as canonical. Fan fiction is never regarded as canonical, though influential ideas within fan communities are sometimes termed “fanon.”

definition
Official or authoritative body of works in a fictional world
contrast
Derivative works, including fan fiction
key dispute
Who has authority to decide canon
related concept
Fanon (fan-accepted ideas)
related concept 2
Headcanon (personal fan interpretation)

Lore & Background

The canon of a work of fiction is defined as the body of works set within a particular fictional world that are widely considered official or authoritative, especially those created by the original author or developer. It serves as the basis for derivative works, including fan fiction, and is contrasted with non-canonical material. There is no universal agreement on who holds the authority to determine canonicity. Copyright holders often declare themselves the authorities, particularly when they wish to erase or retcon materials approved by the setting's original creator. The concept is especially important regarding reboots or re-imaginings of established franchises, as it influences viewer experience. In some cases, works by the original writer but not the same publisher may have debated canonical status, as copyright was historically exercised by the publisher rather than the author. Campaigning by Victor Hugo led to the Berne Convention, which introduced author's rights. Sometimes, original publishers or literary estates posthumously approve continuation novels as canon, such as *The Royal Book of Oz*, written entirely by Ruth Plumly Thompson after the death of original series writer L. Frank Baum, and designated canonical by the original publisher. In film and television, the original writer often does not decide what is canon. Fan fiction is never regarded as canonical, though influential ideas within fan communities are referred to as fanon.

Reader's Guide

During George Lucas's time, the Star Wars canon was divided into discrete tiers incorporating the Expanded Universe (EU), with higher-tier and newer material abrogating lower-tier and older material in case of contradiction. The makers of Doctor Who have generally avoided pronouncements about canonicity. In literature, original writers have not always approved works as canon, but original publishers or literary estates have posthumously approved subsequent works, such as continuation novels like The Royal Book of Oz and Heidi Grows Up. Fan fiction is never regarded as canonical, though influential ideas within fan communities are referred to as fanon.

Did You Know?

Purpose and Definition

A literary device—also called a technique, figure of speech, rhetorical device, stylistic device, or trope—encompasses any deliberate strategy a writer or speaker employs to shape language toward a specific goal. At its core, the aim is to direct an audience's attention, make language or its content memorable, or provoke a particular response whether emotional, intellectual, aesthetic, or otherwise. The concept resists a single clean label because the many synonyms carry subtly different connotations in scholarly contexts. Devices can be sorted into sub-categories such as narrative techniques, poetic tools, argumentative strategies, or linguistic templates, yet they frequently blur across these boundaries. A single figurative device, for instance, might simultaneously serve a narrative and a poetic function. This overlap makes tidy classification difficult, but it also reflects the flexible, multi-purpose nature of language as a creative instrument.

A Web of Terminology

The vocabulary surrounding literary devices is layered and often confusing. The word "trope" originally referred strictly to an artistic effect achieved through figurative, non-literal language—substituting a word or phrase with a less literal one. Over time, its meaning broadened to include recurring motifs, overused character types, and clichés in creative writing. The term traces back through Latin tropus to the Greek tropos, meaning "a turn" or "a change." Meanwhile, "figure of speech" operates on two levels: in its broadest technical sense it is simply another name for any literary device, encompassing both tropes and schemes. Schemes, from the Greek schēma meaning "form or shape," involve rearranging the expected order of words. In everyday conversation, however, people tend to use "figure of speech" to mean specifically a trope. "Rhetorical device" can serve as a general synonym, but more precisely it points to techniques of persuasive and argumentative language designed to make a position more compelling or to prompt an audience to act.

Renaissance Cataloguing and the Classical Inheritance

The systematic study of literary devices reached a high point during the Renaissance, when scholars undertook the ambitious task of enumerating and classifying every figure of speech they could identify. This era of humanist scholarship drew directly on the classical rhetoricians, and the term "figure of speech" itself dates to these Renaissance thinkers who adopted its broad technical meaning. Henry Peacham, in his 1577 work The Garden of Eloquence, compiled a list of 184 distinct figures. Professor Robert DiYanni, writing in his textbook Literature: Reading Fiction, Poetry, Drama and the Essay, noted that rhetoricians had catalogued more than 250 different figures, expressions, or nonliteral ways of using words. This tradition of meticulous enumeration reflects a desire to map the full landscape of language's creative possibilities, even as the sheer number of entries reveals how difficult it is to draw firm boundaries between one device and another.

From Storytelling to Sound

Literary devices find their most visible expression in two major domains: narrative and poetry. In storytelling, tools like allegory—where a story carries a second symbolic meaning, as in Orwell's Animal Farm—alongside flashback, foreshadowing, motif, and the frame story (exemplified by Shelley's Frankenstein, which wraps its central tale inside a sea captain's account) shape how audiences experience plot and character. Mood conveys the emotional atmosphere a narrative intends, while tone reveals the writer's own attitude toward subject and reader. In poetry and sonic language, the focus shifts to sound itself. Alliteration repeats initial consonant sounds across words, as Shakespeare demonstrates in a line from Richard II. Assonance echoes similar vowel sounds within neighbouring words, and consonance repeats consonant sounds at any position within a word, as in a passage from Romeo and Juliet. Cacophony and euphony, meanwhile, deploy clusters of phonemes perceived as harsh or pleasant to shape the listener's sensory response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does 'canon' mean in fiction?

Canon refers to the collection of works in a given fictional universe that are treated as the official, authoritative source material. It typically includes the original author's or developer's published works, as opposed to later adaptations or fan creations.

How is canon different from fan fiction?

Canon is the set of texts the original creator produced and that the community generally accepts as the definitive version of a story world. Fan fiction, by contrast, is a derivative work written by readers that extends, reimagines, or reinterprets that world without the creator's direct involvement.

Who actually decides what counts as canon?

There is no universal rule; the authority to declare something canonical is often contested among publishers, original authors, and the fan community itself. In practice, the person or entity holding the intellectual property usually has the strongest claim, but fans sometimes push back on that designation.

What's the difference between canon, fanon, and headcanon?

Canon is the officially accepted body of work, fanon is a belief or detail the broader fan community has collectively embraced even though it was never stated by the author, and headcanon is a personal interpretation a single fan holds privately. All three coexist in fandom discussions, but only canon carries the weight of the original creator's intent.

Why does canon matter to fans and writers?

Canon serves as the shared reference point that lets fans discuss, debate, and build new stories within a consistent framework. When a work is excluded from canon, it signals that the community (or rights-holder) does not treat it as part of the story's official continuity, which shapes how characters and events are understood.

More in Literary Forms & Tropes 1-23

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →