Ice Hockey Terminology, Part 2 Codexery

Tanking

Intentionally losing games to secure better draft picks.

Tanking

Tanking is when a sports team deliberately puts a weak lineup on the field or court to exploit league rules that reward poor performance. The main goal is to secure a high pick in the next draft, since most leagues award the top selections to the teams with the worst records from the previous season. To start tanking, a team typically trades away its star players, which cuts payroll and brings in younger prospects. Although people sometimes use "tanking" and "rebuilding" as if they mean the same thing, they are not identical. In a rebuild, losses happen as a side effect of trading veterans for young talent, salary cap space, or draft picks. In tanking, losing is the central strategy, pursued specifically to improve draft position.

This practice is far more common in American closed leagues than in open leagues elsewhere, which use promotion and relegation. In those systems, the worst teams get sent down to a lower division and are replaced by the best teams from that lower tier. Relegation slashes a team’s revenue and makes it harder to attract top players, so tanking becomes impractical. Tanking should not be confused with match fixing, which involves rigging a single contest—usually for betting purposes—and violates both league rules and the law.

One early example came from the 1983–84 Houston Rockets. After starting 20–26, the team decided the season was lost and began giving more playing time to weaker players, aiming to finish with the worst record in the Western Conference. That would earn them a coin toss against the Eastern Conference’s worst team for the first overall pick in the 1984 draft. The Rockets went 9–27 the rest of the way, finishing 29–53, won the coin toss, and selected Hakeem Olajuwon from the University of Houston. Olajuwon became one of basketball’s greatest centers, winning two NBA championships with the Rockets. The Rockets’ tactics helped push the NBA to adopt a draft lottery for the first pick starting in 1985.

In the 1983–84 NHL season, both the Pittsburgh Penguins and New Jersey Devils admitted they wanted to lose to get the number one pick and select Mario Lemieux. The Penguins ended up with the worst record, drafted Lemieux, but the NHL did not immediately switch to a lottery; it kept giving the top pick to the worst team until 1995.

First known nba tank
1983–84 Houston Rockets
First known nhl tank
1983–84 Pittsburgh Penguins and New Jersey Devils
Nba losing streak record
28 games (Philadelphia 76ers, 2014–2016)
Largest mlb fine for tanking
$500,000 (Melbourne Football Club, AFL, 2014)
Oakland athletics 2022 payroll drop
$83 million to $48 million
Philadelphia 76ers wins 2013 2016
47 total wins over three seasons

Lore & Background

Tanking is a much more common practice in American sports that utilize closed leagues than open sports leagues in other nations, which typically penalize poor performers using a promotion and relegation system. Relegation costs teams revenue and makes it more difficult for them to attract top talent, making tanking unfeasible. Tanking is differentiated from match fixing, which is done for sports betting purposes and violates rules and laws. One of the first teams to tank was the 1983–84 Houston Rockets, who gave more playing time to lesser talented players to finish with the worst record in the Western Conference, ensuring a coin toss for the first overall pick. The Rockets won the coin toss and drafted Hakeem Olajuwon, who led them to two NBA championships. In the 1983–84 NHL season, the Pittsburgh Penguins and New Jersey Devils admitted they wanted to lose to get the number one pick and select Mario Lemieux. The Penguins finished with the worst record and drafted Lemieux. Tanking did not become prevalent until the 2010s, when teams in all four major American leagues were engaged in various forms of the practice. The Chicago Cubs and Houston Astros pioneered tanking in MLB in the 2010s, with the Astros finishing with the worst record by six games or more for three consecutive years. Both teams used subsequent draft picks to select star players who led them to championships. However, tanking is much less effective in baseball because top MLB draft picks are far less likely to succeed than their counterparts in the NBA or NFL.

Reader's Guide

Tanking's significance lies in its ability to reshape franchises through high draft picks, though it carries risks and controversy. The Philadelphia 76ers' 'The Process' under GM Sam Hinkie exemplified modern tanking: from 2013 to 2016, the team recorded only 47 wins, including an NBA record 28-game losing streak. This poor performance led to Hinkie's departure in April 2016, but the team collected valuable draft assets, selecting cornerstones Joel Embiid and Ben Simmons. From 2017 to 2023, Philadelphia won more than 40 games every season and reached the playoffs each year, though they never advanced past the Conference Semifinals. In the NFL, the Miami Dolphins were accused of tanking during the 2019 season when new head coach Brian Flores oversaw a liquidation of established talent. After starting 0–7, the Dolphins won five of their last nine games, denying them the first overall pick but allowing them to select Tua Tagovailoa. Flores later alleged in a 2022 lawsuit that owner Stephen M. Ross offered to pay him $100,000 for each game he lost. The Oakland Athletics' 2022 tanking was financially motivated, as owner John J. Fisher fielded a team with the second-lowest opening day payroll at $48 million, down from $83 million. Despite finishing with the second-worst record, the team turned a profit of $62.2 million due to increased revenue sharing. This method of tanking is illegal in the NFL, NBA, and NHL because those leagues have a salary floor, but MLB does not, leading critics to argue the league needs one to truly end tanking.

Did You Know?

More in Ice Hockey Terminology, Part 2 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →