Hungarian Revolution of 1848
A pivotal 1848–49 war for Hungarian independence from Habsburg rule.
Last updated
In Hungary, the 1848 revolution and subsequent war for independence is remembered as a foundational moment in the nation's modern identity. It was part of the wider wave of uprisings across Europe that year, particularly within the Habsburg domains. Though the rebellion ultimately failed, its anniversary on March 15th is one of Hungary's three national holidays.
Parliamentary monarchy, the Batthyány government
In April 1848, Hungary became the third country on continental Europe—after France in 1791 and Belgium in 1831—to pass a law establishing democratic parliamentary elections. The new suffrage law (Act V of 1848) replaced the old feudal Estates General with a representative parliament and granted the broadest voting rights in Europe at the time. These April laws also abolished all privileges of the nobility.
The conflict escalated when the new Austrian monarch, Franz Joseph I, arbitrarily revoked the April laws, even though they had already been ratified by King Ferdinand I. This unconstitutional act made war between the emperor and the Hungarian parliament unavoidable. The revocation, along with the new Stadion Constitution and an Austrian military campaign against Hungary, toppled the pacifist Batthyány government, which had sought compromise with the court. Power then shifted to Lajos Kossuth's faction, which demanded full independence.
Austrian military intervention stirred strong anti-Habsburg sentiment, turning the conflict into a war for total separation from the dynasty. About 40% of the private soldiers in the Hungarian Revolutionary Volunteer Army came from the country's ethnic minorities. Roughly half of the officers and generals in the Hungarian Honvéd Army were of foreign origin, and at least as many ethnic Hungarian professional officers served in the Imperial Habsburg army as in the revolutionary Honvéd force.
In foreign policy, Hungarian liberals, like other European liberal revolutionaries of 1848, were driven by ideology. They supported countries and movements that matched their moral and political standards, believing that governments sharing modern liberal values should ally against feudal monarchies—a view similar to modern liberal internationalism.
After a series of serious Austrian defeats in 1849, the Austrian Empire neared collapse. Franz Joseph I was forced to request Russian help under the Holy Alliance.
On May 21, 1849, in Warsaw, the young emperor kissed the hand of Tsar Nicholas I, who agreed to send a 200,000-strong army with 80,000 auxiliary forces. The combined Russo-Austrian army defeated the Hungarian forces. Habsburg rule was restored, and Hungary was placed under martial law.
Hungary before the Revolution
Before the revolution, the Kingdom of Hungary possessed an old historic constitution that limited the Crown’s power and had strengthened parliament since the 13th century. The Golden Bull of 1222 was an early example of constitutional limits on a European monarch, similar to England’s Magna Carta. In 1804, Emperor Franz assumed the title of Emperor of Austria for the dynasty’s hereditary lands, but the Court assured Hungary’s separate Diet that this new title did not affect Hungary’s distinct legal system and constitution.
Another obstacle to Habsburg absolutism in Hungary was the traditionally highly autonomous counties. These were centers of local administration and politics, with a recognized right to refuse to carry out any royal orders they deemed unlawful or unconstitutional. As a result, many orders from Vienna could be questioned on legal grounds.
Until 1848, Hungary’s administration and government remained largely separate from the overarching Austrian Empire. The old Hungarian constitution and public law made it legally impossible to merge Hungary into a different state. The country was governed by the Council of Lieutenancy of Hungary (the Gubernium), based in Pozsony (now Bratislava) and later in Pest, and by the Hungarian Royal Court Chancellery in Vienna.
Unlike in most Western European countries, where a king’s reign began immediately upon his predecessor’s death, in Hungary coronation was essential. Without a proper coronation, the kingdom was considered “orphaned.” Even during the long personal union with other Habsburg territories, the monarch had to be crowned as King of Hungary to promulgate laws or exercise royal prerogatives there.
Lore & Background
In April 1848, Hungary became the third country of Continental Europe (after France, in 1791, and Belgium, in 1831) to enact a law implementing democratic parliamentary elections. The new suffrage law (Act V of 1848) transformed the old feudal parliament (Estates General) into a democratic representative parliament. This law offered the widest right to vote in Europe at the time. The April laws utterly erased all privileges of the Hungarian nobility.
The crucial turning point came when the new Austrian monarch Franz Joseph I arbitrarily revoked the April laws without any legal right (since they had already been ratified by King Ferdinand I). This unconstitutional act irreversibly escalated the conflict between him and the Hungarian parliament. The new constrained Stadion Constitution of Austria, the revocation of the April laws, and the Austrian military campaign against the Kingdom of Hungary resulted in the fall of the pacifist Batthyány government (who sought agreement with the court) and led to Lajos Kossuth's followers (who demanded full independence for Hungary) suddenly gaining power in the parliament. Austrian military intervention in the Kingdom of Hungary resulted in strong anti-Habsburg sentiment among Hungarians, and the events in Hungary grew into a war for total independence from the Habsburg dynasty.
Around 40% of the private soldiers in the Hungarian Revolutionary Volunteer Army consisted of ethnic minorities of the country. Regarding the officer staff of Hungary: Around half of the officers and generals of the Hungarian Honvéd Army had foreign origin. There were at least as many ethnic Hungarian professional officers in the Imperial Habsburg army as in the Hungarian revolutionary Honvéd army.
Era of Reforms
In regard to diplomacy and foreign policy during the revolution, the Hungarian liberals - similar to the other European liberal revolutionaries of 1848 – were primarily motivated by ideological considerations. They supported countries and forces that aligned with their new moral and political standards. They also believed that governments and political movements sharing the same modern liberal values should form an alliance against the 'feudal type' of monarchies. This outlook was similar to modern liberal internationalism.
Reader's Guide
Hungary before the Revolution: Unlike other Habsburg-ruled areas, the Kingdom of Hungary had an old historic constitution, which limited the power of the Crown and had greatly increased the authority of the parliament since the 13th century. The Golden Bull of 1222 was one of the earliest examples of constitutional limits being placed on the powers of a European monarch, which was forced on the Hungarian king in much the same way King John of England was made to sign Magna Carta. In 1804, Emperor Franz assumed the title of Emperor of Austria for all the Erblande of the dynasty and for the other Lands, however the new Erblande term was not applied to Kingdom of Hungary. The Court reassured Hungary's separate parliament, the Diet of Hungary, however, that the assumption of the monarch's new title did not in any sense affect Hungary's separate legal system and constitution.
The other serious problem for the Habsburgs was the traditionally highly autonomous counties of Hungary, which proved to be a solid and major obstacle in the construction of Habsburg absolutism in Hungary. The counties were the centers of local public administration and local politics in Hungary, and they possessed a recognized right to refuse to carry out any 'unlawful' (unconstitutional) royal orders. Thus, it was possible to question the legality of a surprisingly high proportion of the royal orders which emanated from Vienna. Until 1848, the Kingdom of Hungary's administration and government remained largely untouched by the government structure of the 'overarching' Austrian Empire.
However the old Hungarian constitution and Hungarian public law made it legally impossible to merge the Kingdom of Hungary into a different state. Hungary's central government structures remained well separated from the imperial government. The country was governed by the Council of Lieutenancy of Hungary (the Gubernium) – based in Pozsony (now Bratislava) and later in Pest – and by the Hungarian Royal Court Chancellery in Vienna. While in most Western European countries (like France and Britain) the king's reign began immediately upon the death of his predecessor, in Hungary the coronation was absolutely indispensable as, if it were not properly executed, the Kingdom stayed 'orphaned'.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hungarian Revolution of 1848 known for?
Its most concrete achievement was passing a law in April 1848 that established democratic parliamentary elections, making Hungary the third nation on the European continent to do so. It also ignited a full-scale war aimed at severing all ties with the Habsburg dynasty.
When does Hungarian Revolution of 1848 take place?
The revolution began on March 15, 1848, and the ensuing war of independence lasted until 1849. It fits within the wider 1848 European uprisings, particularly those within the Habsburg territories.
More in European Religious And Political Conflicts
Sources
Compiled from Wikipedia and the sources listed below. Text from Wikipedia is available under CC BY-SA 4.0; this entry is adapted from it.
- Wikipedia: Hungarian Revolution of 1848 (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced