Epidemiology Codexery

Badger culling in the United Kingdom

Controversial culling of badgers to control bovine tuberculosis in the UK.

Badger culling in the United Kingdom

Badger culling in the United Kingdom was a government-permitted method of reducing badger numbers to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), a disease caused by Mycobacterium bovis that affects cattle, wildlife, and domestic pets. The practice was controversial, with scientific trials showing limited effectiveness and potential negative effects, and it remains an active policy with ongoing licensed culls.

start_of_modern_culling
2013 (England)
total_badgers_culled_by_2024
approximately 210,000 (as of 2023)
total_cattle_culled_same_period
Not a widely established canonical figure for the exact same period
cost_of_badger_culling_by_2024
Not a standard, widely-cited canonical number

Lore & Background

Badger culling in the UK began with gassing in the 1960s and 1970s to control rabies, but after Mycobacterium bovis was discovered in badgers in Gloucestershire in 1971, culling was used to combat bTB. The Badgers Act 1973 made killing badgers without a licence illegal, later consolidated into the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. From 1998 to 2005, the Randomised Badger Culling Trials (RBCT) were conducted, culling 11,000 badgers in cage traps. The trials found that proactive culling reduced bTB by 19% inside cull areas but increased it by 29% outside due to a 'perturbation effect' where surviving badgers ranged more widely. The Independent Scientific Group concluded in 2007 that badger culling could make no meaningful contribution to bTB control and recommended focusing on cattle measures.

Reader's Guide

The significance of badger culling in the United Kingdom lies in its role as a contentious wildlife management policy aimed at reducing bovine tuberculosis in cattle, a disease with economic costs to farmers and taxpayers. Despite decades of culling, including 210,000 badgers by 2024 at a cost of £58.8 million, scientific evidence from the RBCT showed that culling produced only modest benefits inside cull areas and worsened the disease outside them, with costs far exceeding savings. The policy was ultimately abandoned in favour of vaccination, with no new licences granted after 2024 and the practice effectively ending by May 2026. The legacy includes ongoing debate about the balance between wildlife protection, agricultural economics, and disease control, as well as the importance of evidence-based policy in managing complex ecological and public health issues.

Did You Know?

More in Epidemiology 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →