RaceDayQuads v. FAA
Failed challenge to FAA's remote ID drone tracking rule.
RaceDayQuads, LLC v. FAA, also known as Brennan v. Dickson, was a 2022 United States court case heard in the DC Federal Court of Appeals. The online store RaceDayQuads, owned by CEO Tyler Brennan, challenged the constitutionality and legality of the Federal Aviation Administration's remote ID ruling, which requires all unmanned aerial vehicles in US airspace to continuously transmit the location of both the drone and its operator during all operations. The suit ultimately failed, with the court siding with the FAA.
Quick Facts
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
- Date Decided
- July 29, 2022
- Full Name
- Tyler Brennan and Racedayquads LLC, v. Stephen Dickson, Administrator and Federal Aviation Administration
- Citations
- [https: · www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-caDC-21-01087/USCOURTS-caDC-21-01087-0 No. 21-1087] (D.C. Cir. Jul. 29, 2022)
- Judges
- Cornelia Pillard
- Number Of Judges
- 1
Facts from the source article.
Lore & Background
The FAA filed a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding remote ID on December 31, 2019, and published the final ruling in January 2021, effective April 2021. The rule requires all drone operators in US airspace to comply within 30 months, either via built-in remote ID or retrofitting older drones at consumer expense; businesses and manufacturers must comply within 18 months. The FAA stated the rule assists law enforcement in prosecuting reckless drone operations. Tyler Brennan announced his intention to sue via a blog post, stating the lawsuit was filed on March 17, 2021, and posted a GoFundMe campaign. Brennan argued that remote ID would make drone hobbyists vulnerable to harassment and that companies like ADT Inc might profit from selling drone alerts. The FAA replied on October 15, defending the rule as not violating privacy and noting modifications made after negative comments about internet transmission of identification. RaceDayQuads disputed the FAA's points, arguing no special needs exemption applies under the Fourth Amendment and that mandatory GPS installation is an unconstitutional search.
Reader's Guide
The case is significant as a direct legal challenge to the FAA's remote ID rule, which affects all drone operators in US airspace. The DC Appeals Court, in an opinion by Judge Cornelia Pillard, denied the appeal on July 29, 2022, ruling that the constitutional arguments were frivolous or dependent on applications of the rule rather than the rule itself. The court found Brennan's concerns about ex parte influence unsupported and that the FAA followed Congress's instructions in consulting with RTCA and NIST. The court also ruled the FAA adequately responded to comments questioning the safety rationale, and that dissatisfaction with the substance of the response was not a legitimate ground to invalidate the rule. RaceDayQuads has not announced whether it will appeal to the Supreme Court. The case highlights ongoing tensions between privacy advocates and regulatory efforts to integrate drones into national airspace.
Did You Know?
- The suit was intended to 'save the drone industry', including drone racing using FPV drones.
- The FAA's original rule required transmitting drone identification over the internet, but was modified after negative comments.
- A survey by the Consumer Technology Association found 90% of respondents were uncomfortable with control station location transmission.
- WhiteFox, a California airspace security company, praised the remote ID rule in January 2021.
More in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced