Set Theory & Logic Codexery

New Foundations

A non-well-founded set theory conceived by Quine.

Last updated

New Foundations (NF) is a set theory in mathematical logic that is finitely axiomatizable and non-well-founded. It was devised by Willard Van Orman Quine as a streamlined version of the theory of types found in Principia Mathematica. The well-formed formulas of NF are the standard ones from propositional calculus, using just two primitive predicates: equality (=) and membership (∈).

Definition

The system can be presented with only two axiom schemata. The first is Extensionality: if two objects have exactly the same elements, they are the same object. The second is a restricted axiom schema of comprehension: the set {x | φ} exists for every stratified formula φ. A formula φ is stratified if there is a function assigning natural numbers to its syntactic parts so that for any atomic subformula x ∈ y, the number for y is one greater than the number for x, and for any atomic subformula x = y, the numbers for x and y are equal.

Finite axiomatization

NF can also be given a finite axiomatization, which has the advantage of removing the concept of stratification. In this approach, the axioms correspond to natural basic constructions, whereas stratified comprehension is powerful but less intuitive. In his introductory book, Holmes took the finite axiomatization as fundamental and proved stratified comprehension as a theorem.

Extensionality: If A and B are sets, and for every object x, x is in A exactly when x is in B, then A = B. (This can also serve as a definition of equality, but then another axiom is needed to justify substitution with that definition.) Singleton: For every object x, the set ι(x) = {x} = {y | y = x} exists. Cartesian Product: For any sets A and B, the set A × B = {(a, b) | a ∈ A and b ∈ B} exists. This can be restricted to just A × V or V × B. Converse: For each relation R, the set R⁻¹ = {(x, y) | (y, x) ∈ R} exists. Singleton Image: For any relation R, the set Rι = {({x}, {y}) | (x, y) ∈ R} exists. Domain: If R is a relation, the set dom(R) = {x | ...} exists.

Quick Facts

Field
Mathematical logic
Known for
Non-well-founded, finitely axiomatizable set theory; simplification of the theory of types

Facts from the source article.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who created New Foundations and why?

Willard Van Orman Quine devised NF as a leaner alternative to the full theory of types in Principia Mathematica. His aim was to recover the essential typed structure of that system using far fewer axioms and a simpler logical base.

What makes New Foundations distinct from ZFC or other standard set theories?

NF is both non-well-founded and finitely axiomatizable, two properties that ZFC does not share. It also operates with only two primitive predicates—equality and membership—inside ordinary first-order logic, rather than requiring a richer language.

What axioms does New Foundations actually rest on?

The system is built from just two schemata: an Extensionality axiom saying that objects with exactly the same members are identical, and a restricted Comprehension schema that permits set-formation only for formulas satisfying a stratification condition. This compact axiom base is what earns NF the label 'finitely axiomatizable.'

Why do set theorists and logicians still study New Foundations?

NF provides a concrete, finitely axiomatized setting where questions about the universal set, large cardinals, and circular membership can be investigated without the full apparatus of ZFC. Its non-well-founded character also makes it a natural laboratory for exploring self-referential and circular mathematical structures.

More in Set Theory & Logic

Sources

Compiled from Wikipedia and the sources listed below. Text from Wikipedia is available under CC BY-SA 4.0; this entry is adapted from it.

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →