Set Theory And Foundations Codexery

Axiom of extensionality

Axiom defining set equality by identical members.

The axiom of extensionality, also known as the axiom of extent, appears in many versions of axiomatic set theory, including Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. It essentially defines what a set is: informally, two sets are equal precisely when they contain the same members.

The term "extensionality" comes from logic. An intensional definition gives the necessary and sufficient conditions for a term to apply to an object—for instance, "an even number is an integer divisible by 2." An extensional definition, by contrast, lists every object the term applies to—for example, "an even number is any of the integers 0, 2, 4, 6, 8..., -2, -4, -6, -8..." In logic, the extension of a predicate is the set of all things for which that predicate holds true.

This logical concept was introduced into set theory in 1893 by Gottlob Frege in his Basic Laws of Arithmetic. He formally used the idea of an extension: for a predicate F, its extension (in German, Umfang) is the set of all objects satisfying F. For instance, if F(x) is "x is even," then its extension is the set {..., -4, -2, 0, 2, 4, ...}. Frege defined his infamous Basic Law V as: the extension of F equals the extension of G if and only if for all x, F(x) is equivalent to G(x). This law states that if two predicates have the same extension—meaning they are satisfied by the same objects—then they are logically equivalent. However, it was later discovered that this axiom leads to Russell's paradox.

The first clear statement of the modern axiom of extensionality appeared in 1908, in a paper by Ernst Zermelo on the well-ordering theorem. There, Zermelo presented the first axiomatic set theory, now called Zermelo set theory, which became the foundation for modern set theories. The term Zermelo used for "extensionality" was Bestimmtheit. The English word "extensionality" only became common in mathematical and logical texts during the 1920s and 1930s, especially with the formalization of logic and set theory by figures such as Alfred Tarski and John von Neumann.

In the formal language of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the axiom is written as: ∀x∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y]. In words: if the sets x and y have the same members, then they are the same set. In pure set theory, every member of a set is itself a set, though this is not the case in set theories that include urelements.

Quick Facts

First explicit statement
1908 by Ernst Zermelo
Original term by zermelo
Bestimmtheit
Associated figures
  • Gottlob Frege
  • Ernst Zermelo
  • Alfred Tarski
  • John von Neumann
  • W.V. Quine

Facts from the source article.

Background

In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the axiom reads: ∀x∀y [∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y]. In Quine's New Foundations (NF) set theory, the treatment of equality differs. In Quine's 1937 paper, equality was defined as ∀z (x ∈ z → y ∈ z), and the principle of extensionality was given as a separate postulate. In his 1951 Mathematical Logic, Quine defined equality as ∀z (z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y), exactly equivalent to the antecedent of the ZF axiom, and introduced a substitutivity axiom.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Axiom of extensionality?

It is the foundational rule in axiomatic set theory stating that two sets are identical if and only if they share exactly the same elements. Ernst Zermelo gave it its first explicit formulation in 1908, originally labelling it with the German word 'Bestimmtheit.'

Where does the name 'extensionality' come from?

The term is borrowed from logic, where an extensional definition pins down a term by listing every object it applies to, in contrast to an intensional definition that spells out necessary and sufficient conditions. Frege transplanted that logical distinction into the set-theoretic setting in 1893, and the English word gradually entered mathematical parlance by the 1920s.

More in Set Theory And Foundations

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →