Dicotyledon
Former major division of flowering plants with two seed leaves.
Flowering plants, or angiosperms, were once split into two main groups: the dicotyledons (dicots) and the monocotyledons (monocots). The name "dicot" comes from the fact that their seeds typically contain two embryonic leaves, called cotyledons. Monocots, by contrast, usually have just one. For a long time, these two categories were considered the primary divisions of all flowering plants.
However, starting around the 1990s, studies of plant DNA (molecular phylogenetics) confirmed what some botanists had already suspected: dicots are not a single, unified group descended from one common ancestor (a monophyletic group). Instead, several lineages—including the magnoliids and other so-called basal angiosperms—split off before the monocots did. In other words, monocots actually evolved from within the traditional dicot group. This makes the traditional dicots a paraphyletic group (one that includes a common ancestor but not all of its descendants).
The largest true (monophyletic) group within the dicots is the eudicots. What sets eudicots apart from other flowering plants is their pollen structure: while most other dicots and monocots have pollen with a single furrow (monosulcate), eudicots have pollen with three or more furrows (tricolpate).
When comparing monocots and dicots, many of the classic differences—like scattered vascular bundles, three-parted flowers, and non-tricolpate pollen—actually separate monocots from eudicots, not from all dicots. Many early-diverging dicot groups share these monocot-like traits, and some monocots have dicot-like features, such as netted leaf veins.
In older classification systems, dicots were called Dicotyledones or Dicotyledoneae. In the Cronquist system, they were treated as the class Magnoliopsida (named after the genus *Magnolia*). Some schemes split the eudicots into a separate class, Rosopsida, while leaving the remaining dicots (sometimes called palaeodicots or basal angiosperms) in Magnoliopsida. A few botanists still argue for keeping dicots as a valid class, citing practical and evolutionary reasons.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) system, now in its fourth version (APG IV), provides a modern phylogenetic tree showing that the traditional dicots are paraphyletic to the monocots. Other systems, like those of Dahlgren and Thorne, used the subclass name Magnoliidae for dicots. Although these systems share many superorder names, the specific orders grouped under each superorder often differ. For instance, Thorne's Theanae corresponds to five separate superorders in Dahlgren's system, only one of which is also called Theanae.
For further reading, see the related term Calyciflorae. External links include a world list of dicot species (Magnoliopsida) from the Catalogue of Life, with over 253,000 species, and a tree browser for dicot orders, families, and genera with species counts.
- field
- Botany
- known_for
- One of the two former divisions of flowering plants, characterized by two cotyledons
- status
- Paraphyletic group (not monophyletic)
Lore & Background
Largely from the 1990s onwards, molecular phylogenetic research confirmed that dicotyledons are not a monophyletic group—that is, they do not consist of all descendants of a common ancestor. Instead, a number of lineages, such as the magnoliids and groups now collectively known as the basal angiosperms, diverged earlier than the monocots did; monocots evolved from within the dicots as traditionally defined. The traditional dicots are thus a paraphyletic group. The eudicots are the largest monophyletic group within the dicotyledons. They are distinguished from all other flowering plants by the structure of their pollen: eudicots have tricolpate pollen (grains with three or more pores set in furrows called colpi), whereas other dicotyledons and monocotyledons have monosulcate pollen (or derived forms) with a single sulcus. Aside from cotyledon number, other broad differences have been noted between monocots and dicots, although these have proven to be differences primarily between monocots and eudicots. Many early-diverging dicot groups have monocot characteristics such as scattered vascular bundles, trimerous flowers, and non-tricolpate pollen. In addition, some monocots have dicot characteristics such as reticulated leaf veins.
Reader's Guide
The dicotyledons historically served as one of the two primary divisions of flowering plants, a classification that persisted for centuries. However, molecular phylogenetic research from the 1990s onward revealed that the group is paraphyletic, as monocots evolved from within the dicots. This finding reshaped botanical taxonomy, leading to the recognition of the eudicots as the largest monophyletic subgroup within the dicots, defined by tricolpate pollen. The legacy of the dicot concept remains in its practical utility for describing many flowering plants, though modern systems like the APG IV treat it as a paraphyletic assemblage. The term continues to appear in historical and some contemporary classifications, such as the Cronquist system, where dicots are treated as the class Magnoliopsida. The shift from a simple dicot-monocot dichotomy to a more nuanced phylogenetic tree underscores the ongoing refinement of plant systematics based on genetic evidence.
Did You Know?
- Dicotyledons were formerly divided into two groups with monocotyledons, based on the number of cotyledons in the seed.
- Molecular research from the 1990s onward confirmed that dicots are paraphyletic, with monocots evolving from within them.
- Eudicots, the largest monophyletic group within dicots, have tricolpate pollen, unlike the monosulcate pollen of other dicots and monocots.
- Some early-diverging dicot groups have monocot characteristics such as scattered vascular bundles and trimerous flowers.
More in Plant Families & Taxonomy 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
