An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
A revision of Hume's Treatise, emphasizing habit and skepticism.
Last updated
David Hume, a Scottish philosopher working within the empiricist tradition, published this work in English in 1748 under its original title, Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding; it was not until a 1757 edition that it acquired its now-familiar name. The book was a deliberate revision of his earlier, more ambitious A Treatise of Human Nature, which had been published anonymously in London between 1739 and 1740. Hume was deeply disappointed by the poor reception of the Treatise, which he famously remarked "fell dead-born from the press." In response, he crafted the Enquiry as a shorter, more polemical work intended to present his more developed ideas to a broader public.
Content
The Enquiry omits much of the material found in the Treatise, such as Hume's views on personal identity, in favor of clarifying and emphasizing what he considered its most vital propositions. For instance, his argument for the central role of habit in a theory of knowledge is retained and highlighted. The book has proven highly influential, immediately and in modern times; Immanuel Kant credited it with waking him from his "dogmatic slumber." It is widely regarded as a classic in modern philosophical literature. The argument proceeds through incremental, logically successive chapters, beginning with an exposition of Hume's epistemology before applying those principles to specific topics.
The first section divides philosophy into natural philosophy and the philosophy of human nature, or "moral philosophy," which investigates both actions and thoughts. Hume then distinguishes between "impressions" (sensations) and "ideas" (memories and imaginings), arguing that impressions are the source of all ideas, though he acknowledges a potential objection in the "Missing Shade of Blue" thought-experiment. He later discusses the association of ideas through resemblance, contiguity, and cause-and-effect, and introduces the crucial distinction between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact," leading to his skeptical doubts about reasoning from experience.
Lore & Background
The Enquiry proceeds by a series of incremental steps, separated into chapters that logically succeed one another. After expounding his epistemology, Hume explains how to apply his principles to specific topics.
In the first section, he divides philosophy into natural philosophy and moral philosophy (the philosophy of human nature), warning that nuanced philosophers may be cast aside in favor of those whose conclusions match popular opinion, but insisting that precision aids all crafts, including philosophy. The second section distinguishes impressions (sensations) from ideas (memories and imaginings), arguing that ideas are less vivacious and that impressions are the source of all ideas. Hume discusses mental operations such as compounding, transposing, augmenting, and diminishing, and addresses the problem of 'The Missing Shade of Blue' as an exceptional case.
Reader's Guide
The Enquiry is significant for its clear presentation of Hume's empiricist epistemology and his skeptical challenge to inductive reasoning. Hume argues that all ideas derive from impressions, and that our belief in cause-and-effect is grounded in habit, not rational justification. This work famously woke Immanuel Kant from his 'dogmatic slumber,' as Kant himself noted.
The Enquiry is widely regarded as a classic in modern philosophical literature, and its arguments on induction and the limits of human understanding remain central to contemporary philosophy. When citing Hume on induction, scholars should be explicit that he gives a psychological explanation and a skeptical challenge about justification, not a reductive proof that induction is irrational. It is legitimate to read Hume as a precursor to subjective/epistemic probability, but one should not anachronistically import modern Bayesian formalism as if Hume provided it; his account is qualitative and psychological, making room for quantitative comparisons of chances.
More in Nonfiction & Philosophy
Sources
Compiled from Wikipedia and the sources listed below. Text from Wikipedia is available under CC BY-SA 4.0; this entry is adapted from it.
- Wikipedia: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Spotted an error? Know more?
Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced