Named Comets, Part 2 Codexery

C/1988 Y1 (Yanaka)

Carbon- and cyanogen-depleted non-periodic comet discovered in 1988.

C/1988 Y1 (Yanaka)

Tetsuo Yanaka spotted this comet on the night of 29 December 1988 using 25×150 binoculars. At the time, it was a 9th-magnitude object in Ophiuchus, moving northwest. David H. Levy confirmed the find the next evening. Bright moonlight made observations and orbit calculations tricky in late December 1988; only Gary W. Kronk and Alan Hale recorded magnitudes (9.1 and 9.4, respectively). While searching for this comet a few days later, Yanaka discovered a second one, C/1989 A1, on 1 January 1989. The last known sighting came from M. Tsumura on 27 February 1989, when the comet was a 15th-magnitude object in Canis Major.

Brian G. Marsden published the first parabolic orbit on 4 January 1989, based on eight observations. Further parabolic solutions on 8 January, 26 January, and 22 March all showed that the comet had reached perihelion on 11 December 1988 at 0.43 AU (64 million km) from the Sun. No new orbital calculations appeared until 2017, when Gary W. Kronk used all 36 observations from 1 January to 27 February 1989 to determine a hyperbolic trajectory with an eccentricity of 1.000187.

Chemically, the comet showed emissions of OI and NH₂ but no detectable C₂ or CN emissions—by factors of 100 and 25, respectively. Such low production rates might mean it was a dynamically new comet entering the inner Solar System for the first time, or that it formed from an interstellar cloud with a composition very different from the nebula that gave rise to the Solar System. This carbon- and cyanogen-depleted makeup is otherwise known only in comet 96P/Machholz.

Quick Facts

Discovery Ref
IAUC_4696
Discoverer
Tetsuo Yanaka
Discovery Site
Motegi, Japan
Discovery Date
29 December 1988
Designations
1988 XXIV, 1988rICQ1
Orbit Ref
jpldata · Kronk_2017
Epoch
12 January 1989 (JD 2447538.5)
Observation Arc
57 days
Obs
56
Perihelion
0.428 AU
Eccentricity
1.000187
Inclination
71.011°

Facts from the source article.

Lore & Background

Tetsuo Yanaka discovered C/1988 Y1 using a pair of 25 × 150 binoculars on the night of 29 December 1988, when it was a 9th-magnitude object in Ophiuchus, moving northwest. David H. Levy verified the discovery the following night. Bright moonlight in December 1988 hindered observations and orbital calculations; only Gary W. Kronk and Alan Hale recorded magnitudes of 9.1 and 9.4 respectively. While searching for this comet, Yanaka discovered his second comet, C/1989 A1, on 1 January 1989. M. Tsumura made the last known observations on 27 February 1989, when it was a 15th-magnitude object in Canis Major.

Brian G. Marsden published the first parabolic orbital elements on 4 January 1989 based on 8 observations. Additional parabolic orbits on 8 January, 26 January, and 22 March showed perihelion occurred on 11 December 1988 at 0.43 AU. In 2017, Gary W. Kronk used all 36 observations from 1 January to 27 February 1989 to determine a hyperbolic trajectory with eccentricity 1.000187.

Spectral observations revealed emissions of OI and NH2 compounds but no C2 or CN emission, with production rates lower by factors of 100 and 25 respectively. This depletion may indicate the comet is dynamically new, entering the inner Solar System for the first time, or it may have formed from an interstellar cloud with a composition different from the Solar System's nebula.

Reader's Guide

C/1988 Y1 (Yanaka) holds significance primarily for its extreme chemical depletion, a trait it shares only with 96P/Machholz among known comets. The absence of C2 and CN emissions, by factors of 100 and 25 respectively, challenged typical cometary composition models. The source article notes two possible explanations: it could be a dynamically new comet entering the inner Solar System for the first time, or it might have originated from an interstellar cloud with a fundamentally different composition than the solar nebula. This ambiguity underscores the comet's legacy as a subject for studying cometary diversity and the origins of volatile materials. Its hyperbolic orbit, determined decades later by Gary W. Kronk using all available observations, suggests it may not return, adding to its uniqueness. The discovery itself, made with binoculars by an amateur astronomer, and the subsequent verification by David H. Levy, highlight the role of visual observers in comet discovery. The comet's brief observational window from December 1988 to February 1989, hampered by moonlight, limited data but still provided enough for orbital and spectral analysis.

Did You Know?

More in Named Comets, Part 2 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →