Nominalization
Nominalization turns verbs, adjectives, or adverbs into nouns.
Nominalization, also referred to as nouning, involves using a word from another part of speech—typically a verb, adjective, or adverb—as a noun or the head of a noun phrase. This shift in grammatical category may be achieved through morphological transformation, such as adding a derivational affix, but it can also occur without any inflectional change, a process known as conversion or zero derivation. For instance, the verb "legalize" can become the noun "legalization" via the suffix "-ation," while other words, like "combine," can serve as either a verb or a noun depending on syntactic context without any added morphology. English exhibits both patterns. Derivational morphology for nominalization includes a variety of suffixes, which linguists like Huddleston have categorized into groups such as person/instrument nominalizations and action/state/process nominalizations. A particularly common example in English is the gerund, formed by adding "-ing" to a verb. Zero-derivation nominalization, also called conversion, allows verbs and adjectives to be used directly as nouns. Additionally, some English words shift functional category through changes in pronunciation, notably stress placement moving from the final syllable to the first, as seen in initial-stress-derived nouns. The word "use" provides another case: its nominal form ends with an unvoiced /s/ sound, while its verbal form ends with a voiced /z/. Adjectives can also be nominalized, as in "the poor" referring to poor people generally. In other Indo-European languages, dedicated nominalizing suffixes are common; Latin, for instance, has several such suffixes, some of which entered English via Romance languages. German shows subtle inflectional differences between adjectives and their nominalized forms, while Spanish and Portuguese exhibit a permeable boundary between adjectives and nouns, with many roots straddling both categories. In Chinese varieties, particles nominalize verbs and adjectives: Mandarin uses 的 (de), Cantonese uses 嘅 (ge), and Minnan uses ê. Classical Chinese particles 所 (suǒ) and 者 (zhě) indicate patient and agent, respectively, and retain limited productivity. Zero-derivation also occurs in Chinese, as with 教育 (jiàoyù), which functions as both a verb and a noun. Vietnamese typically relies on zero derivation for nominalization, but in formal contexts, classifiers like (indicating qua
- field
- Linguistics
- known_for
- Process of turning non-nouns into nouns
- types
- Derivational morphology and zero-derivation
- languages_discussed
- English, Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese, Hawaiian, Tibeto-Burman, Indo-European
Lore & Background
In English, two types of nominalization occur: one requiring a derivational suffix (e.g., 'legalization' from 'legalize') and the other using the same word without additional morphology (zero-derivation, e.g., 'combine' as both verb and noun). Stress and pronunciation changes also signal nominalization, as with 'use' where the noun has a final voiceless /s/ and the verb a voiced /z/. Adjectives can also be nominalized, as in 'the poor' meaning poor people. In Chinese, particles like 的 (de) in Mandarin, 嘅 (ge) in Cantonese, and ê in Minnan nominalize verbs and adjectives. Particles 所 (suǒ) and 者 (zhě) indicate patient and agent respectively. Many words also undergo zero-derivation, such as 教育 (jiàoyù) meaning both 'to educate' and 'education'. Vietnamese uses classifiers like cái, tính, and sự for nominalization, while Japanese uses particles の (no), もの (mono), and こと (koto). Hawaiian uses the particle ʻana, as in 'hele ʻana' for 'coming'. In Tibeto-Burman languages, nominalization is pervasive and serves functions like forming complement and relative clauses. Some languages, such as Eastern Shina (Gultari), allow finite clauses to be nominalized without morphological transformation. The syntactic analysis of nominalization continues to be an important area of study.
Reader's Guide
Nominalization is a fundamental linguistic process that allows speakers to transform verbs, adjectives, or adverbs into nouns, enabling more flexible expression. It is a natural part of language, but its overuse can make texts dense, while its strategic use can pack more information into fewer sentences. Writing advice sometimes cautions against excessive nominalization, as active verbs are often more direct. Across languages, nominalization takes various forms. English employs both derivational suffixes (e.g., -ation, -ing) and zero-derivation, as well as stress and pronunciation changes. Chinese uses particles and zero-derivation, while Vietnamese relies on classifiers. Japanese and Hawaiian use specific particles, and Tibeto-Burman languages exhibit pervasive nominalization for grammatical functions. The study of nominalization reveals how languages balance morphological transformation with syntactic flexibility, and it remains a key topic in linguistic theory, particularly in understanding the boundary between lexical and syntactic categories.
Did You Know?
- In English, the noun 'use' has a final voiceless /s/ sound, while the verb 'use' has a final voiced /z/ sound.
- In Mandarin Chinese, the particle 的 (de) is attached to verbs and adjectives to nominalize them, e.g., 吃 (chī, 'to eat') becomes 吃的 (chīde, 'that which is eaten').
- In Hawaiian, the particle ʻana is used to nominalize verbs, as in 'hele ʻana' meaning 'coming'.
- Some languages, like Eastern Shina (Gultari), allow finite clauses to be nominalized without any morphological transformation.
More in Linguistic Concepts And Phenomena 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record