Defamation
Legal remedy for injury to reputation, honour, or dignity.
Defamation is a communication that injures a third party's reputation and causes a legally redressable injury. Its precise legal definition varies from country to country, and it is not necessarily restricted to false assertions, extending to abstract concepts such as dignity and honour. In the English-speaking world, defamation law traditionally distinguishes between libel (written, printed, posted online, published in mass media) and slander (oral speech), and is treated as a civil wrong, a criminal offence, or both.
The legal history of defamation stretches back to classical antiquity, with Roman and early English law forming the primary foundations of contemporary systems. In Roman law, verbal defamation was initially addressed through a civil action for a monetary penalty, punitive in nature but also encompassing compensation. Later, criminal law expanded to punish many forms of defamation severely, particularly the publication of defamatory writings known as *libri famosi*, from which the modern term "libel" derives. Under later emperors, this term specifically applied to anonymous accusations, which were punished harshly regardless of truth. The Praetorian Edict, codified around AD 130, allowed legal action against anyone who made an abusive outcry contrary to good morals. According to the jurist Ulpian, the offence consisted of shouting something apt to bring another into disrepute or contempt. In public cases, truth was no justification for the insulting manner of publication, though the accused could justify their actions by proving their assertions true for public safety. In private defamation, truth was a sufficient defence, as no one had a right to legal protection for a false reputation. In Anglo-Saxon England, slander was punished by cutting out the tongue. Historically, defamation of a commoner was called libel or slander, while defamation of an English aristocrat was termed *scandalum magnatum*.
Following the Second World War, the right to a legal remedy for defamation was included in Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This right coexists with the right to freedom of opinion and expression under Article 19 of the same covenant, which permits limitations necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others. International human rights law thus requires domestic defamation law to balance these righ
- field
- Law
- known_for
- Legal protection of reputation, honour, and dignity
- legal_tradition
- Roman law and early English law
- key_distinction
- Libel vs. slander
- human_rights_framework
- ICCPR Article 17 and Article 19
Lore & Background
Defamation is a communication that harms a third party’s reputation and causes a legally actionable injury. Its precise legal definition varies by country, and it is not limited to false statements; it can also involve abstract concepts such as dignity and honour. In English-speaking legal systems, defamation traditionally divides into libel (written, printed, posted online, or published in mass media) and slander (oral speech). It may be treated as a civil wrong, a criminal offence, or both. Defamation laws can cover a wide range of acts, from general insults against any citizen to specialized provisions targeting public officials, state institutions, state symbols, heads of state, religions (blasphemy), or the judiciary and legislature (contempt of court). The history of defamation law extends back to classical antiquity. Roman law originally confined the remedy for verbal defamation to a civil action for a monetary penalty, but later criminal law expanded to punish many forms of defamation severely. Under Roman emperors, the term *libel* came to refer specifically to anonymous accusations or pasquils, which were punished harshly regardless of truth. The Praetorian Edict, codified around AD 130, allowed an action for shouting contrary to good morals, provided the shouting was apt to bring a person into disrepute or contempt. In private defamatory statements, truth was a sufficient defence. In Anglo-Saxon England, slander was punished by cutting out the tongue, and defamation of an aristocrat was called *scandalum magnatum*. Under international human rights law, the right to a legal remedy for defamation is recognized in Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but this right must be balanced with freedom of expression under Article 19, which permits limitations necessary for respect of the reputations of others.
Reader's Guide
Defamation law's significance lies in its role as a legal mechanism to balance the protection of reputation with freedom of expression. International human rights law, particularly ICCPR Articles 17 and 19, requires that domestic defamation law provide for truth as a valid defence, recognize reasonable publication on matters of public concern, and ensure that defamation is addressed as a tort. The European Convention on Human Rights permits restrictions on freedom of speech when necessary to protect reputation or rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee's General comment No. It also recommends that states consider decriminalizing defamation. Despite these frameworks, the worldwide use of criminal and civil defamation to censor, intimidate, or silence critics has been increasing in recent years.
Did You Know?
- Defamation law can extend to concepts more abstract than reputation, such as dignity and honour.
- In Roman law, the truth of defamatory statements was no justification if they were made in a public and insulting manner.
- In Anglo-Saxon England, slander was punished by cutting out the tongue.
- The United Nations Human Rights Committee's General comment No. 34 recommends that states consider the decriminalization of defamation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Defamation?
Defamation is the legal doctrine governing communications that harm another person's reputation and create a legally compensable injury. It is not limited to outright lies; it can also encompass broader notions like dignity and honour, and its exact boundaries shift across different national legal systems.
What are Defamation's powers/role?
Defamation operates as a legal shield protecting an individual's reputation, honour, and dignity from injurious statements made by others. Depending on the jurisdiction, it can be pursued as a civil tort, a criminal offence, or both, giving the injured party a formal avenue for redress.
How does Defamation's story end?
A defamation claim typically resolves through a legal remedy—such as damages, a retraction, or an injunction—awarded by a court to the party whose reputation was harmed. The precise outcome depends on whether the case is framed as a civil wrong or a criminal matter under the applicable legal system.
Why is Defamation important?
Defamation sits at the intersection of free expression and personal dignity, which is why it is anchored in human-rights frameworks like ICCPR Articles 17 and 19. Its roots stretch back to Roman law and early English law, making it one of the oldest and most enduring protections in the legal tradition.
What's the key distinction in Defamation's lore?
In English-speaking legal traditions, Defamation splits into two main branches: libel, which covers written, printed, or digitally published statements, and slander, which covers spoken words. This libel-versus-slander divide shapes how a claim is brought, what proof is required, and what remedy is available.
More in Legal Concepts & Doctrines 1-21
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record