We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.
Last full accuracy audit: 2026-09-08 · 18 entries checked · 12 flagged · 28 issues confirmed · 12 corrected · 16 still open
Bosom of Abraham — The entry claims that 4 Maccabees 13:17 contains the phrase 'Bosom of Abraham' or the specific expectation that 'Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will receive us' in that wording, but the verse does not use that phrase or exact wording.
Bosom of Abraham — The entry claims that the Apocalypse of Zephaniah describes a river with an angelic ferryman leading to the Bosom of Abraham, but this specific detail is not a standard, widely-attested element of that text and conflates details from other works.
Darius the Mede — The claim that 'there is no space in the historical timeline between Belshazzar and Cyrus the Great' is misleading because there is a gap of a few months, but the real error is that it implies no chronological space exists, whereas the actual issue is that no
Darius the Mede — The claim that 'the story of Daniel in the lions' den (Daniel 6) is based on the Babylonian folk-tale Ludlul Bel Nemeqi' is a factual error because Ludlul Bel Nemeqi does not contain a lions' den story or a decree.
Ephraim ben Isaac of Regensburg — The Regensburg massacre of 1137 is not a historically documented event; the known persecutions in Regensburg occurred during the First Crusade (1096) and the Second Crusade (1146–1147).
Ephraim ben Isaac of Regensburg — The claim that he wrote over thirty-two piyyutim is not verifiable from standard historical sources; the number of extant piyyutim attributed to him is typically cited as around thirty, not 'over thirty-two'.
Sources and parallels of the Exodus — The entry states 'the Sinai Peninsula shows almost no occupation during the entire 2nd millennium BCE' and repeats this in the 'DID YOU KNOW' section. This is an overstatement; archaeological evidence shows occupation at sites like Serabit el-Khadim (turquoise
Sources and parallels of the Exodus — The entry claims 'Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites supposedly spent 38 years, was uninhabited before the early 12th century BCE.' This is factually incorrect; archaeological evidence indicates occupation at Kadesh-Barnea (Tell el-Qudeirat) beginning in the
The Exodus — The entry states the Israelites escaped through a path in the Red Sea, but the biblical text describes the sea being parted, not a pre-existing path.
The Exodus — The entry says the Israelites were enslaved under a new pharaoh who did not know Joseph, but the biblical narrative does not specify that this pharaoh was a new ruler; it simply says a pharaoh arose who did not know Joseph.
Fall of man — The entry states the fall of man is a 'Christian term,' but the prompt specifies this is an entry about Jewish mythology. The term and doctrine are indeed Christian, not part of Jewish mythology or canon.
Fall of man — The entry claims the phrase 'fall of man' likely originates from the Book of Wisdom. While the Book of Wisdom is a deuterocanonical book, the specific phrase 'fall of man' is not found there; it is a later theological term. This is a misattribution of origin.
Forbidden fruit — The claim that the Zohar explains Noah attempted to rectify Adam's sin by using grape wine for holy purposes is not a widely-known, established fact in canonical Jewish mythology; it is an invented or highly interpretive claim not supported by standard canonic
Forbidden fruit — The Quran does not specify the fruit as a 'forbidden fruit' in the narrative sense; it refers to a tree (shajarah) that Adam and his wife were told not to approach, and the identification as 'forbidden fruit' is a later interpretive gloss, not a direct Quranic
Japheth — The entry states that Japheth's sons include 'Tiras' and 'Madai,' but the standard list in Genesis 10:2 is Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The order is incorrect: Madai is listed third, not seventh, and Tiras is seventh, not third.
Japheth — The entry says 'Genesis 9:24 calls Ham the youngest,' but Genesis 9:24 does not explicitly call Ham the youngest; it says Noah 'knew what his youngest son had done to him,' which is traditionally interpreted as referring to Ham, but the text does not name Ham
All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap
Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.