Historiography

Lore & Background

The academic discipline of historiography was established in Europe in the 19th century, not earlier. The practice of writing history dates back to the 5th century BC with Herodotus' Histories, which founded Greek historical writing. In the 2nd century BC, the Roman statesman Cato the Elder produced the Origines, an early Roman historical work, though it was preceded by traditions like the Annales Maximi. In Asia, Sima Tan and Sima Qian established Chinese historiography with the Shiji during the Han Empire. During the Middle Ages, medieval historiography included chronicles in Europe, works in the Ethiopian Empire, Islamic histories, and Korean and Japanese histories based on the Chinese model. During the 18th-century Age of Enlightenment, historiography in the Western world was shaped by figures such as Voltaire, David Hume, and Edward Gibbon, who laid the groundwork for the modern discipline. In the 19th century, historical study became professionalized at universities and research centers, marking the true birth of historiography as an academic discipline.

Reader's Guide

Historiography is significant because it examines not past events directly, but the changing interpretations of those events in the works of individual historians. The research interests of historians shift over time; from 1975 to 1995, the proportion of professors of history in American universities identifying with social history increased from 31 to 41 percent, while political historians decreased from 40 to 30 percent. In 2007, of 5,723 faculty members in history departments at British universities, 29 percent identified with social history and 25 percent with political history. Since the 1980s, there has been special interest in memories and commemoration of past events. The extent to which historians are influenced by their own groups and loyalties—such as to their nation state—remains a debated question. The term historiography originally meant 'the writing of history,' and official historians were given titles like 'Historiographer Royal' in Sweden (from 1618), England (from 1660), and Scotland (from 1681); the Scottish post still exists.

Did You Know?

• The earliest known systematic historical thought emerged in ancient Greece in the 5th century BC.
• Herodotus is known as the 'father of history' and wrote The Histories.
• Cato the Elder produced the first Roman historiography, the Origines, in the 2nd century BC.

Roots in Antiquity

The impulse to record and interpret the past appears to be a universal human drive, with the earliest chronologies emerging in ancient Egypt and Sumerian-Akkadian Mesopotamia. Yet these early works were typically anonymous, lacking narrative structure or detailed analytical depth. True historiography—written history in narrative form intended to inform future generations about events—crystallized in Classical Antiquity. In 5th-century BC Greece, Herodotus of Halicarnassus composed The Histories, earning him the enduring title "father of history." He distinguished between more and less reliable accounts, traveled extensively to gather firsthand information about various Mediterranean cultures, and while emphasizing the actions and characters of men, still attributed an important role to divinity in shaping historical events. In Rome, Cato the Elder produced the Origines in the 2nd century BC, marking the first Roman historiographic work. In China, the father-and-son pair Sima Tan and Sima Qian established the tradition with the Shiji during the Han Empire. These parallel developments across civilizations laid the foundational groundwork for all subsequent historical scholarship.

The Long Arc of Development

From the Middle Ages through the modern era, historiography evolved through distinct and sometimes overlapping phases. Medieval scholars produced chronicles across Europe, the Ethiopian Empire in the Horn of Africa, the Islamic world through Muslim historians, and East Asia, where Korean and Japanese scholars drew on the existing Chinese model. The 18th-century Enlightenment brought a transformative wave: Voltaire, David Hume, and Edward Gibbon shaped Western historiography and set the intellectual foundations for the modern discipline. The 19th century marked a decisive turning point as historical studies became professionalized within universities and research centers, accompanied by a widespread conviction that history operated much like a science. This institutionalization generated a vast corpus of historiographic literature. By the 20th century, historians began weaving in dimensions drawn from the social sciences—politics, economics, and culture—broadening the discipline's analytical toolkit considerably. Each era's scholars built upon, adapted, or challenged the methods of their predecessors, creating a layered intellectual tradition that continues to evolve in response to new questions and new sources.

The Great Shift in Focus

A notable transformation in historiographic priorities has unfolded over recent decades, with research interests migrating away from traditional diplomatic, economic, and political history toward social and cultural studies. In American universities, the share of history professors identifying with social history rose from 31 to 41 percent between 1975 and 1995, while the proportion of political historians fell from 40 to 30 percent over the same two decades. A 2007 survey of 5,723 history faculty at British universities found that 29 percent aligned themselves with social history and 25 percent with political history. Alongside this disciplinary realignment, a new preoccupation emerged since the 1980s: the study of how past events are remembered, commemorated, and presented for popular celebration. This interest in collective memory and public narrative represents a departure from purely archival scholarship, acknowledging that the way societies narrate their past carries its own historical significance. Meanwhile, the question of how much historians are shaped by their own national loyalties and group affiliations remains an open and actively debated issue within the field.

What the Term Actually Means

The word "historiography" has carried shifting meanings across centuries. In the early modern period, it simply meant "the writing of history," and a historiographer was essentially a historian. This older sense persists in official titles: Sweden appointed a Historiographer Royal from 1618, England from 1660, and Scotland from 1681, with the Scottish post surviving to the present day. The modern definition is more specific and meta: historiography is the study of how history has been and is written—the history of historical writing itself. Studying historiography does not mean examining past events directly; rather, it means tracing the changing interpretations of those events as they appear in the works of individual historians. In practice, the term also extends to any body of historical work on a particular subject. Scholars organize their discussions by topic—such as the historiography of World War II, early Islam, or the pre-Columbian Americas—and by genre, distinguishing approaches like political history from social history. The discipline thus operates on a reflective level, examining the methods, sources, and theoretical frameworks that shape what we come to know about the past.

Gallery