Folk process
The process of communal transformation and re-adaptation of folklore.
The folk process is a concept in folklore studies describing how folk material—especially stories, music, and other art—is transformed and re-adapted as it is transmitted from person to person and from generation to generation. It defines a community, the 'folk community,' through which folklore is transmitted, emphasizing refinement and creative change by community members within the tradition.
- field
- Folklore studies, musicology
- coined_by
- Charles Seeger
- underlying_concept_origin
- Cecil Sharp, 1907
- key_factors
- Continuity, variation, selection
- expanded_by
- International Folk Music Council, 1954
Lore & Background
The phrase 'folk process' was originally coined by musicologist Charles Seeger, father of folk singer Pete Seeger, but the underlying concept goes back to 1907, when Cecil Sharp observed that the transmission of folk songs and their forms resulted from three factors: continuity, variation, and selection. These factors were expanded on in 1954 by the International Folk Music Council, which defined folk music as the product of a musical tradition evolved through oral transmission, shaped by continuity linking present with past, variation from creative impulse, and selection by the community determining which forms survive.
The transformation and reinterpretation of received material is central to the folk process. For example, the traditional Irish lament 'Siúil A Rúin' is sometimes speculatively linked to the American Revolutionary War-era song 'Johnny Has Gone for a Soldier,' but this connection is not universally accepted in mainstream scholarship, and the American song is widely documented as dating from the late 18th century, not a 19th-century adaptation. Similarly, the Child ballad 'Matty Groves' and the American folk song 'Shady Grove' are distinct in narrative and tune, with no established direct lineage supported by mainstream folklore scholarship.
Through the folk process, subjects of folk song and narrative are adapted to suit the times; lyrics can be added or removed, and parts no longer understood can be re-interpreted or discarded. The result is new folklore that the next generation preserves in its new form. The process became problematic when it began to operate on copyrighted commercial products, and when mass culture appropriated folk narrative and music, distributing them via mass media as newly canonical versions.
Reader's Guide
The folk process is significant because it explains how folklore evolves within communities, balancing continuity with creative variation and communal selection. It distinguishes folk music from composed popular music that remains unchanged when taken over by a community, emphasizing that re-fashioning and re-creation give folk music its character. The concept highlights the tension between oral tradition and mass culture, as seen in the case of 'Scarborough Fair,' where Simon and Garfunkel asserted sole authorship of a traditional song, contrasting with earlier generations' acceptance of communal ownership. The Internet and digital media have accelerated the folk process by enabling consumers to copy, alter, and select bits of both folk and mass culture. Historically, mass culture and folk culture have cross-pollinated, as with the broadside 'The Unfortunate Lad' becoming the cowboy standard 'Streets of Laredo' and the jazz standard 'St. James Infirmary Blues.' The folk process remains a key lens for understanding how tradition and innovation interact in cultural transmission.
Did You Know?
- The phrase 'folk process' was originally coined by musicologist Charles Seeger.
- The underlying concept goes back to 1907, when Cecil Sharp identified continuity, variation, and selection as key factors.
- The International Folk Music Council expanded on these factors in 1954.
- The American Revolutionary War-era song 'Johnny Has Gone for a Soldier' is sometimes speculatively linked to the Irish lament 'Siúil A Rúin,' but this derivation is not universally accepted in mainstream scholarship.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the folk process?
The folk process refers to the ongoing transformation and creative reworking of traditional material—such as songs, tales, and other cultural expressions—as it passes between individuals and across generations within a community. It highlights that folklore is never a fixed artifact but is continuously reshaped by the people who carry it forward.
Who coined the term 'folk process'?
Charles Seeger introduced the phrase within the fields of musicology and folklore studies. The underlying idea of communal creative transformation, however, can be traced back to Cecil Sharp's 1907 work.
What are the three key factors of the folk process?
Continuity, variation, and selection are identified as the core mechanisms driving the folk process. Together they explain how a tradition preserves its essential character while still evolving through the creative choices of individual members and the group as a whole.
Why is the folk process important to folklore studies?
It provides a framework for understanding folklore as a living, communal activity rather than a static object to be catalogued. By centering the role of the folk community in refining and reshaping material, it shifts scholarly attention toward the people who actively sustain traditions.
How did the folk process concept develop after its initial formulation?
The International Folk Music Council broadened and formalized the concept in 1954, extending its scope beyond music to encompass all forms of folk expression. That institutional endorsement helped cement the folk process as a central analytical tool across the discipline.
More in Folklore studies 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
