We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.
Last full accuracy audit: 2026-09-08 · 18 entries checked · 16 flagged · 35 issues confirmed · 16 corrected · 19 still open
Fire Emblem: The Binding Blade — The claim that the game sold 'over 345,000 units' is not a widely confirmed, precise figure from official sources; sales data for The Binding Blade is not officially published at that exact number, and such a specific figure is unverifiable in established cano
Fire Emblem: The Binding Blade — The statement that the game 'began development as a Nintendo 64 title called Fire Emblem: Maiden of Darkness' is a common fan misconception; the N64 prototype was titled 'Fire Emblem 64' or 'Fire Emblem: The Maiden of Darkness' (sometimes 'Fire Emblem: Ankoku
Fire Emblem Echoes: Shadows of Valentia — The entry states the game is the 'fifteenth main entry in the Fire Emblem series', but it is actually a remake of the second game, not the fifteenth main entry.
Fire Emblem Echoes: Shadows of Valentia — The DID YOU KNOW section says the final boss of the post-game labyrinth is 'heavily implied to be Grima from Fire Emblem Awakening', but the game treats it as a separate ancient being named 'The Creation' or 'Fell Dragon', not as Grima.
Fire Emblem Engage — The entry incorrectly states that collecting all twelve Emblem Rings allows a spell of immense magic to be cast, whereas in canon it allows the 'Emblem of the Founder' ritual to summon the original Emblem to defeat Sombron.
Fire Emblem: Fortune's Weave — The entry claims this is the 18th main installment in the Fire Emblem series, but as of 2023's Fire Emblem Engage, that game is the 17th main installment; thus Fortune's Weave would be the 18th only if it is released and counted as such, but the numbering is s
Fire Emblem: Fortune's Weave — The entry states the game is set to launch on the Nintendo Switch 2, but no official Fire Emblem game has been announced for that platform, and the release date 'September 17, 2026' is entirely fabricated with no official confirmation.
Fire Emblem Gaiden — The entry states 'Gunpei Yokoi came back as composer and producer.' Gunpei Yokoi was not the composer; Yuka Tsujiyoko was the composer.
Fire Emblem Gaiden — The entry says 'It introduced a class evolution system that was retained in all subsequent Fire Emblem titles.' This is factually incorrect; the class evolution system was introduced in the first Fire Emblem game, not Gaiden.
Fire Emblem Heroes — The lore section mentions 'Vanaheimr' as a realm in later books, but as of 2025 canon, Vanaheimr has not been introduced as a named realm in the main story books.
Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem — The entry states that Book 2 takes place 'two years later' after Book 1, but in the actual game, Book 2 begins one year after the events of Book 1.
Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem — The 'DID YOU KNOW' section says 'The romance between Marth and Caeda was a refined version of a similar plot from Fire Emblem Gaiden.' This is inaccurate: Fire Emblem Gaiden does not feature Marth or Caeda, and the romance between them originates in the origin
Fire Emblem: New Mystery of the Emblem — The entry states the game has four difficulty levels (normal, hard, maniac, lunatic), but it actually has five, including Lunatic Reverse.
Fire Emblem: New Mystery of the Emblem — The entry says the customizable Avatar is 'the main character alongside Marth,' but Marth is the sole main protagonist; Kris is a supporting character, not a co-main protagonist.
All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap
Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.