We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.
Last full accuracy audit: 2026-09-11 · 28 entries checked · 17 flagged · 48 issues confirmed · 17 corrected · 31 still open
History of the Empire of Brazil — The entry states 'the complete abolition of slavery by the Gold' — this is incomplete and incorrect; slavery was completely abolished by the Lei Áurea (Golden Law) on 13 May 1888, not by 'the Gold'.
Abdication of Pedro I of Brazil — The abdication occurred at two o'clock in the morning of 7 April 1831: The abdication actually took place around 2:00 PM on 7 April 1831, not 2:00 AM.
Abdication of Pedro I of Brazil — After abdicating, Pedro I embarked on the English ship Warspite with his pregnant wife Amélie and daughter Princess Maria: Pedro I embarked on the British ship HMS Warspite, but his wife Amélie and daughter Princess Maria did not accompany him on that ship; th
Brazilian Constituent Assembly (1823) — The assembly was dissolved on the night of 11 November 1823, not in the early hours of 12 November 1823.
Brazilian Constituent Assembly (1823) — The dissolution was carried out by military force (troops), not police.
Brazilian Constitution of 1824 — The statement that the constitution 'remained in effect until February 24, 1891' is misleading; it was de facto replaced by the provisional government's decrees after the proclamation of the republic on November 15, 1889, though the 1891 Constitution formally
Brazilian Constitution of 1824 — The date '12 June 1823' for the law project waiving the monarch's sanction is incorrect; the project was presented on June 12, 1823, but it was a proposal to require the monarch's sanction for laws, not to waive it. The actual conflict arose from the Assembly'
Brazilian Party — The claim that the Brazilian Party had a branch in Angola that proclaimed the Brazilian Confederation is false; the Brazilian Confederation was a separatist revolt in northeastern Brazil in 1824, not related to Angola.
Brazilian Party — The claim that the Brazilian Party was led by Prince Regent Pedro I is misleading; he was not formally its leader, as the party was a loose coalition without a single formal leader.
Brazilian units of measurement — The claim that in 1814 Brazil adopted a new Portuguese metric system based on the original metric system but with traditional Portuguese names is incorrect; Brazil was still a colony and did not implement that system.
Brazilian units of measurement — The statement that the metric system became compulsory in Brazil in 1862 is inaccurate; Law No. 1157 of 1862 set a transition period, and full compulsory adoption came later.
Cidade Velha (Belém) — The expedition 'Feliz Lusitânia' arrived in 1615–1616, not 1580.
Cidade Velha (Belém) — The claim that the Church of Saint Alexander's convent is 'the most important Jesuit complex in Brazil' is subjective and not a verifiable factual statement.
Cisplatine War — The 1801 Treaty of Badajoz did not transfer Colônia do Sacramento to Spain; it was returned to Portugal by that treaty, and the definitive cession to Spain was by the 1777 Treaty of San Ildefonso.
Cisplatine War — The Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata was created in 1776, but the text implies it was created after 1801, which is chronologically incorrect.
All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap
Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.