Documentary Film Series Codexery

Killing Us Softly

A documentary series critiquing advertising's portrayal of women.

Killing Us Softly is an American documentary series created by Jean Kilbourne and produced by the Media Education Foundation. First released in 1979 and updated three times, most recently in 2010, it examines how advertising portrays women, focusing on gender stereotypes, self-image effects, and the objectification of women's bodies. The series is notable for its sustained critique of the advertising industry's role in perpetuating harmful representations.

Quick Facts

Director
Sut Jhally
Based on
Lecture by Jean Kilbourne
Producer
Media Education Foundation
Released
2010
Runtime
45 minutes
Country
United States
Language
English

Facts from the source article.

Did You Know?

Overview

Advertising gets a harsh critique from Kilbourne, who calls out its harmful practices. She says the shallow, objectifying, and unrealistic images of women in ads damage their self-worth. Nearly every product is sold using sexualized women, which she claims degrades them, promotes abuse, and upholds a sexist, male-dominated culture. Kilbourne even compares advertising to pornography, calling advertisers the nation's true pornographers.

Versions

The series evolved from lectures Kilbourne delivered at American universities since the early 1970s. Four editions exist: Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women (1979); Still Killing Us Softly: Advertising's Image of Women (1987), an update by Margaret Lazarus and Renner Wunderlich through Cambridge Documentary Films, with Kilbourne as co-creator; Killing Us Softly 3 (1999), directed by Sut Jhally and produced by the Media Education Foundation, reviewing changes over 20 years; and Killing Us Softly 4 (2010), also directed by Jhally, using contemporary ads to note that the more things have changed, the more they've stayed the same.

Reception

The series has been widely used in university lectures and by community organizers and feminist groups. Editions have been described as extremely popular and praised; Bakari Chavanu called it an engaging and humorous analysis of how images shape values. Ford et al. noted it raises feminist consciousness and has been positively correlated with boycotts of offensive advertisements. Paul Rutherford criticized Kilbourne's crusade against advertising, arguing she conflates pornography and erotica, overlooks satirical and artistic values, and ignores fashion's influence.

More in Documentary Film Series

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →