We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.
Last full accuracy audit: 2026-09-11 · 19 entries checked · 11 flagged · 36 issues confirmed · 11 corrected · 25 still open
Nivatakavacha — The entry incorrectly states Atikaya is Ravana's son; in the Valmiki Ramayana, Atikaya is a son of Kumbhakarna, not Ravana.
Nivatakavacha — The entry claims Indra asked Arjuna to destroy the nivatakavachas as his dakshina, but in the Mahabharata (Vanaparva) the term 'dakshina' is not used in that context; it is presented as a test or favor, not a fee.
Andhaka — The entry states Andhaka was given to Hiraṇyākṣa, but in the widely-known Shiva Purana account, he is given to Hiraṇyakaśipu, not Hiraṇyākṣa.
Andhaka — The entry says Andhaka was made a Gaṇa chief after being told of his biological parentage, but in the standard Shiva Purana narrative, the parentage revelation occurs earlier, and he is made a Gaṇa chief after being impaled on Shiva's trident and repenting.
Holika — The claim that the Vishnu Purana says Holika claimed a boon made her immune to fire is inaccurate; the Vishnu Purana does not mention a boon for Holika.
Ilvala and Vatapi — In the LORE section, the claim that Ilvala begged a Brahmin hermit to grant him a son equal to Indra is not found in the widely-known Mahabharata version (e.g., Vana Parva).
Ilvala and Vatapi — In the LORE section, the detail that Ilvala demanded ten thousand cows, pieces of gold, and a golden chariot yoked by two steeds from Agastya is incorrect; in the Mahabharata, Agastya does not demand such tribute.
Kalanemi — Kalanemi is not the son of Virochana; Virochana is the father of Bali, not Kalanemi.
Kalanemi — Kalanemi is not slain by Vishnu in the Tarakamaya War; Vishnu chops off his arms but does not kill him in that war.
Lavanasura — Lavanasura is not the son of Madhu and Kumbhini in the Valmiki Ramayana; Kumbhini is not mentioned as his mother in the epic.
Lavanasura — The claim that Madhu drowned himself in the ocean out of shame is not found in the Valmiki Ramayana.
Mahabali — The entry states Mahabali is the grandson of Prahlada, but he is the great-grandson.
Mahabali — The entry says Mahabali temporarily possessed the amrita obtained by the asuras, which is not typically described in the Puranas.
Maruts — The entry states 'In the Rig Veda’s sixth mandala, hymn 66 describes how a rainstorm transforms into these storm deities.' This is not a standard description of Rigvedic hymn 6.66; that hymn praises the Maruts but does not describe a rainstorm transforming int
Maruts — The entry says 'they were once considered by Indra, who is called Marutvant.' The phrase 'considered by Indra' is unclear and likely a misstatement; Marutvant simply means 'accompanied by the Maruts' and does not imply Indra considered them as his own.
All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap
Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.