Aircraft Components Codexery

Crack arrestor

Structural device that contains cracking to prevent catastrophic failure.

Crack arrestor

A crack arrestor, also known as a rip-stop doubler, is a structural engineering device typically shaped into a ring or strip and composed of a strong material. It serves to contain stress corrosion cracking or fatigue cracking, helping to prevent the catastrophic failure of a device. The crack arrestor can be as simple as a thickened region of metal, or may be constructed of a laminated or woven material designed to withstand deformation without failure. When correctly applied, the technique is capable of redirecting movement and safely distributing stresses, and is compatible with fail-safe design practices.

Year of notable use
1954
Aircraft model involved
de Havilland Comet
Industry patent holder
Airbus Group
Patent year
2008
Navy applying technology
United States Navy
Timeframe of navy use
2010s

Lore & Background

Crack arrestors have seen extensive use in the aviation sector, particularly upon large pressurised aircraft as a means of guarding against progressive metal fatigue. The skin of the fuselage typically has a large number of high stress locations, rivetting being a leading cause, making these points of potential crack initiation. Calculations are frequently used to simulate crack propagation, as well as the effectiveness of mitigating measures such as crack arrestors in ensuring the aircraft can be safely operated. Following two catastrophic airframe failures in 1954, crack arrestors were used as additional reinforcement of the fuselage of the de Havilland Comet, although this was only one of several design changes made to address structural design weaknesses related to metal fatigue and skin stresses that had been previously unknown to the aviation industry.

Naval vessels are another place where crack arrestors have been extensively used. As of the 2010s, the United States Navy frequently applies them to areas of the ship that have been damaged or otherwise have received repairs in order to ensure that the affected element is not lacking in either strength or durability. It has been acknowledged that ships primarily composed of aluminium are significantly more prone to crack propagation than older steel counterparts; thus, the use of mitigating measures is likely to become more commonplace. Crack arrestors have also been used in civil engineering, including long-term use in the nuclear industry as a structural element of reactors, and in numerous pipelines used for transporting chemicals to protect against bursting and exterior damage alike. While commonly applied to metal alloys, appropriately designed crack arrestors have been used with composite materials as well. During 2008, Airbus Group was awarded a patent for a new design technique for a crack arrestor component.

Reader's Guide

The significance of the crack arrestor lies in its role as a fail-safe measure against progressive metal fatigue, particularly in high-stress environments such as pressurised aircraft fuselages. Its legacy is tied to the de Havilland Comet failures of 1954, after which it was adopted as one of several design changes to address previously unknown structural weaknesses. The device's compatibility with fail-safe design practices has made it a standard tool in aviation, naval, and civil engineering contexts. In naval applications, the United States Navy's use on damaged or repaired areas of ships highlights its role in maintaining strength and durability, especially as aluminium-hulled vessels become more common. The patent awarded to Airbus Group in 2008 indicates ongoing innovation in crack arrestor design. Its ability to redirect movement and safely distribute stresses, whether in metal alloys or composite materials, underscores its versatility. The technique's reliance on calculations to simulate crack propagation and mitigation effectiveness demonstrates its integration into modern engineering analysis, ensuring that structures can be safely operated despite the presence of potential crack initiation points.

Did You Know?

More in Aircraft Components 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

Reader corrections go straight into our review queue. Suggest an edit · How this site is sourced

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →